Resource Library

Amicus brief

2

• DOJ Statement of Interest in N.P. v. Georgia
• DOJ Statement of Interest in S.R. and L.G. v. Kenton County Amicus Brief

Assessment

29

• A Call For Justice: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2002)
• Advancing Youth Justice: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel in Oregon (2020)
• Arizona Bringing Gault Home: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel (2018)
• Colorado: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings (2012)
• Delaware: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings (2017)
• District of Columbia: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel (2018)
• Florida: An Assessment of Access to Counsel & Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2006)
• Georgia: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings
• Illinois: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2007)
• Indiana: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2006)
• Justice Cut Short: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings in Ohio (2003)
• Juvenile Legal Defense: A Report on Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation for Children in Nebraska (2009)
• Kentucky-Advancing Justice: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2002)
• Limited Justice: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel in Kansas (2020)
• Maine: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2003)
• Maryland: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2003)
• Mississippi: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2007)
• Missouri-Justice Rationed: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Juvenile Defense Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2013)
• Montana: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2003)
• North Carolina: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2003)
• Overdue for Justice: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel in Michigan (2020)
• Pennsylvania: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (October 2003)
• Selling Justice Short: Juvenile Indigent Defense in Texas (2000)
• South Carolina: Juvenile Indigent Defense: A Report on Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2010)
• The Children Left Behind: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings in Louisiana (2001)
• Undervalued: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel in New Hampshire (2020)
• Virginia: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2002)
• Washington: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Juvenile Offender Matters (2003)
• West Virginia: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Juvenile Delinquency Court (2010)
Show all articles ( 21 ) Collapse Articles

Bench Card

8

• Access to Juvenile Justice Irrespective of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression (SOGIE): Supporting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Gender Non-Conforming (LGBTQ-GNC) Youth
• Addressing Bias in Delinquency and Child Welfare Systems
• Applying Principles of Adolescent Development in Delinquency Proceedings
• Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement: Obstacles to Opportunities
• Ensuring Young People Are Not Criminalized for Poverty: Bail, Fees, Fines, Costs, and Restitution in Juvenile Court
• Honoring Gault: Ensuring Access to Counsel in Delinquency Proceedings
• National Child Traumatic Stress Network Bench Card for Juvenile Court Judges: Newcomer Immigrant Youth in Juvenile Justice Court Proceedings: A Trauma-Informed Approach
• Navigating Virtual Proceedings in Juvenile Court: A Guide for Judges

Court Decisions

3

• Kent v. United States Opinion
• Miller v. Alabama Opinion
• Roper v. Simmons Opinion

Policy Tool

138

• A Guide to Juvenile Detention Reform: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
• A Radical Model for Decriminalization: Research Model & Initial Findings
• A Right to Liberty: Reforming Juvenile Money Bail
• ABA Report: Abolishing Financial Conditions of Pretrial Release in Juvenile Cases
• ABA Resolution & Report on Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling (2015)
• ABA Resolution on Pretrial Release in Juvenile Cases (2017)
• Access Denied: A National Snapshot of States' Failure to Protect Children's Right to Counsel
• Alaska Shackling Reform Rule (2014)
• Ambassadors for Racial Justice Call to Action
• American Bar Association Resolution on Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling
• Appeals: A Critical Check on the Juvenile Delinquency System
• Association of Prosecuting Attorneys Statement of Principles
• Boulder County Policy for Limited Restraint on Children Policy
• Broken Contracts: Contract Counsel Toolkit
• Broken Contracts: Reimagining High-Quality Representation of Youth in Contract and Appointed Counsel Systems
• CAIJS Fact Sheet on Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling
• CAIJS Report on Shackling and Courtroom Safety (2016)
• CAIJS Shackling Reform Model Statute & Court Rule (2015)
• Call for a Nationwide Moratorium on Juvenile Fees and Fines (2020)
• Campaign Against Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling Toolkit
• CAUTION: Collateral Consequences: Obstructing the Pathway to Young People's Success
• Center for Children's Law and Policy Statement on Urgent Action Needed for Youth Justice Professionals in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Child Welfare League of America Policy Statement: Juvenile Shackling
• Coalition Statement on Protecting Youth and Communities from Risks Posed by the Novel Coronavirus
• Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement: An Opportunity for Partnership
• Commemorating Gault at 50
• COVID-19 Letter from Philadelphia Defenders Union (March 15, 2020)
• COVID-19 Letter from Philadelphia Defenders Union (March 21, 2020)
• COVID-19 Letter from the Colorado State Public Defender
• COVID-19, Additional Guidance to Juvenile Facilities (California Board of State and Community Corrections)
• D.C. Administrative Order 15-07: Individual Determinations for the Use of Restraints on Respondents
• Dear Colleague Letter: Civil Rights in Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities
• Dear Colleague Letter: Educational Needs of Students with Disabilities in Correctional Facilities
• Dear Colleague Letter: Federal Pell Grant Eligibility for Students Confined or Incarcerated in Locations That Are Not Federal or State Penal Institutions
• Defend Children Executive Summary: A Blueprint for Effective Juvenile Defender Services
• Defend Children: A Blueprint for Effective Juvenile Defender Services
• Developing Statutes for Competence to Stand Trial in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: A Guide for Lawmakers
• Diez Principios Fundamentales: Para Prestar Representación Legal de Alta Calidad a Delincuentes Juveniles Dentro Del Sistema de Defensores Públicos
• Dual Status Youth - Technical Assistance Workbook
• Due Process in the Time of COVID: Defenders as First Responders in a Juvenile Court System Struggling with the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Electronic Monitoring of Youth in the California Juvenile Justice System
• Eliminating Shackling in Juvenile Court: Continuing the Momentum (2019)
• Ensuring Access: A Policy Advocacy Toolkit (2018)
• Fair and Just Prosecution Statement from Elected Prosecutors on COVID-19 and Addressing the Rights and Needs of Those in Custody
• From Courts to Communities: The Right Response to Truancy, Running Away, and Other Status Offenses
• Future Interrupted: The Collateral Damage Caused by Proliferation of Juvenile Records
• Futures in the Balance: Disrupting the School-to-Prison Pipeline
• Futures in the Balance: Examples of How Juvenile Court Hurts Youth and Communities
• Futures in the Balance: Myths and Facts About the Impacts of Juvenile Court
• Futures in the Balance: Reforms that Keep Youth in School
• Gault at 50 Campaign Toolkit
• Gender Injustice: System-Level Juvenile Justice Reforms for Girls
• Graduated Responses Toolkit: New Resources and Insights to Help Youth Succeed on Probation
• Growing Up Locked Down: Youth in Solitary Confinement in Jails and Prisons Across the United States (2012)
• Guiding Principles for Providing High-Quality Education in Juvenile Justice Secure Care Settings
• Hawaii Policy Limiting Shackling in Juvenile Court
• Health Services Los Angeles County Letter re Maintaining the Decreased Population of Incarcerated Youth in Los Angeles County
• Hidden Injustice: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth in Juvenile Courts
• High Pain, No Gain: How Juvenile Administrative Fees Harm Low-Income Families in Alameda County, California
• In re Amendments to the Tennessee Rules of Juvenile Procedure (2015)
• Increasing Juvenile Appeals: An Underused Critical Check on the Juvenile Delinquency System
• Issue Brief-Advancing Post-Disposition Representation to Protect the Due Process Rights of Youth and Promote Positive Youth Outcomes
• Issue Brief-Campaign Against Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling
• Issue Brief-Ending the Indiscriminate Shackling of Youth
• Issue Brief-Juvenile Defense Standards: A Framework for the Specialized Representation of Youth
• Issue Brief-Protecting Rights, Promoting Positive Outcomes: Post-Disposition Access to Counsel
• Issue Brief-Raising the Bar with Comprehensive Juvenile Indigent Defense Contracts
• Issue Brief-Specialized Training: Advancing the Ethical and Professional Representation of Youth
• Issue Brief-The Cost of Juvenile Probation: A Critical Look into Juvenile Supervision Fees
• Joint Statement on the Importance of Specialization of Judges, Prosecutors, and Defenders in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings
• Justice Roundtable Recommendations for Protecting Incarcerated Youth and Adults During and in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Juvenile Defense Attorneys: A Critical Protection Against Injustice-The Importance of Skilled Juvenile Defenders to Upholding the Due Process Rights of Youth
• Juvenile Defense Law School Clinics: Building Leaders, Client Capacity, and Innovation
• Juvenile Defense Manager-Supervisor Tool for Best Practices in Detention Advocacy
• Juvenile Defense Self-Assessment Tool
• Juvenile Justice Initiative COVID-19 Press Release
• Juvenile Justice Initiative Letter re: Guidance for Probation, Detention & Juvenile Court Judges in Light of COVID-19
• Juvenile Offender and Victims: 2014 National Report
• Juvenile Restitution Statutes Across the United States (2015)
• Lawyers Committee for Children's Rights Letter to Governor McMaster re COVID 19 and South Carolina's Juvenile Justice System
• Lawyers Committee for Children's Rights Letter to South Carolina Supreme Court re State Juvenile Justice Response to COVID 19 Crisis
• Louisiana Center for Children's Rights Letter re COVID-19 Emergency Executive Order Authorizing Immediate Release of Youth in Secure and Non-Secure Care
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Early Appointment of Counsel
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Addressing the Legal Needs of Youth After Disposition
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Eliminating the Practice of Indiscriminate Shackling of Youth
• Models for Change Knowledge Brief: Can Risk Assessment Improve Juvenile Justice Practices?
• Myth vs. Fact: Youth Transfer Laws
• National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice Policy Statement on Indiscriminate Shackling of Juveniles in Court
• National Juvenile Defender Center Racial Justice Statement
• National Juvenile Defender Center Recommendations for the Biden/Harris Administration
• National Juvenile Defender Center Statement on COVID-19 Pandemic & Urgent Need for Juvenile Legal System to Act
• National Juvenile Defender Center Statement on Recent Deaths of Black Americans & Need to Dismantle Systemic Racism
• National Prevention Science Coalition to Improve Lives Youth Shackling Statement
• NCJFCJ Resolution Regarding Shackling of Children in Juvenile Court
• NJDC Letter to Indiana Supreme Court in support of the Juvenile Appointment of Counsel Rule Amendment
• Pacific Juvenile Defender Center Statement on COVID-19 and Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
• Performance Guidelines for Quality and Effective Juvenile Delinquency Representation (2010)
• Physicians for Criminal Justice Reform Letter re COVID-19 Risks for Detained and Incarcerated Youth
• Physicians for Criminal Justice Reform Press Release: Physicians Strongly Urge Governors, Justice System Leaders, and Judges Release Incarcerated Youth Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
• Policy Report-Unchain the Children: Five Years Later in Florida (2011)
• Promoting Positive Development: The Critical Need to Reform Youth Probation Orders
• Raised on the Registry: The Irreparable Harm of Placing Children on Sex Offender Registries in the US (2013)
• Request for Immediate Action to Address COVID-19 in Colorado's Juvenile Detention and Commitment Facilities
• Resolution by the Colorado Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Advisory Council Endorsing Specialization in Juvenile Court Practice
• Restoring Justice: A Blueprint for Ensuring Fairness, Safety, and Supportive Treatment of LGBT Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
• Risk Assessment in Juvenile Justice: A Guidebook for Implementation
• Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel Post-Disposition (2016)
• San Francisco Youth Interrogation Ordinance
• Shackling Children in Court: Implications for Adolescent Development
• SMART on Juvenile Indigent Defense
• South Carolina Bar Youth Shackling Resolution & Commentary
• Southern Juvenile Defender Center COVID-19 Pandemic Policy Statement
• Special Caution Required: The Realities of Youth Interrogation
• Standards for Counsel Representing Individuals Pursuant to the Montana Public Defender Act (2012)
• Ten Core Principles For Providing Quality Delinquency Representation Through Public Defense Delivery Systems
• Testimony of Tim Curry, Managing Attorney, National Juvenile Defender Center on Access to Justice in the United States
• The Cost of Juvenile Probation: A Critical Look into the Harms of Juvenile Supervision Fees
• The Costs and Benefits of Subjecting Juveniles to Sex-Offender Registration and Notification
• The Criminalization of Childhood (2019)
• The Dangers of Detention: The Impact of Incarcerating Youth in Detention and Other Secure Facilities
• The Fragmented State of Juvenile Indigent Defense
• The Impact of National Standards on Juvenile Defense Practice (2013)
• The Importance of Early Appointment of Counsel in Juvenile Court
• The Legal Defense of Juveniles: Struggling but Pushing Forward
• The Role of Defense Counsel at Disposition (2016)
• The Trajectory of a Traumatized Youth: A Three System Perspective
• The Unfair Criminalization of Gay and Transgender Youth: An Overview of the Experiences of LGBT Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
• Toward Equity: A Training Curriculum for Understanding Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression, and Developing Competency to Serve Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
• Transforming Juvenile Probation: A Vision for Getting It Right
• Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack II: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
• Utah Shackling Reform Bill 2015
• Washington State Jails Coronavirus Management Suggestions in 3 "Buckets" (Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs)
• When Systems Collaborate: How Three Jurisdictions Improved Their Handling of Dual-Status Cases
• Where Are There Statewide Bans on Automatic Juvenile Shackling (2019)
• Why Juvenile Defense Matters Fact Sheet
• Why Juvenile Justice Matters to Counties
• Youth Incarceration by the Numbers: United States and Delaware
• Youth on Probation: Bringing a 20th Century Service Into a Developmentally Friendly 21st Century World
Show all articles ( 130 ) Collapse Articles

Practice Tool

97

• 10 Tips For Building Effective Youth-Family-Defender Partnerships
• 115 Question Sample Cross-Examination
• A Developmental Framework for Juvenile Disposition and Post-Disposition Advocacy
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in California
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Indiana
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Maryland
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Massachusetts
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Minnesota
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Missouri
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Nebraska
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in New Jersey
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in New Mexico
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Ohio
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in South Carolina
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Texas
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Virginia
• A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in Washington
• A Juvenile Defender's Guide to Conquering Collateral Consequences
• A Parent's Guide to Juvenile Court (Maryland)
• A Right to Liberty: Resources for Challenging the Detention of Children
• A Snapshot of Juvenile Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws
• A Young Person Just Got Arrested: What Do You Do Within the First 24 Hours? (Brochure)
• A Young Person Just Got Arrested: What Do You Do Within the First 24 Hours? (Poster)
• ABA Waiver Resolution and Report
• Achieving Excellence in Detention Advocacy: Guidelines for Juvenile Defenders to Provide Zealous Advocacy at Initial Detention Hearings
• Alternate Public Defender Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate (California)
• Application for Extraordinary Relief Under the Court's King's Bench Jurisdiction
• California v. Male Client - Implied Waiver and Voluntariness (Appellant's Opening Brief)
• Cases on Due Process and Experts in Transfer Proceedings
• Confined Without Cause: The Constitutional Right to Prompt Probable Cause Determinations for Youth
• COVID-19 Defendant's Motion for Judicial Release (Ohio)
• COVID-19 Sample Letter to Jails of Local Sheriff (Washington)
• DOJ Statement of Interest in Varden v. Clanton
• Emergency Motion for Pre-Adjudication Release Due to Public Health and Safety Threat Posed by COVID-19 Pandemic (North Carolina)
• Encouraging Judges to Support Zealous Defense Advocacy from Detention to Post-Disposition: An Overview of the Juvenile Delinquency Guidelines of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
• Essential Elements of a Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice System
• Findings Regarding Department of Justice Investigation of Lauderdale County Youth Court, Meridian Police Department, and Mississippi Division of Youth Services
• First Amended Complaint for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial (California)
• Frequently Asked Questions: The Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel
• Guidance to Juvenile Courts on Conducting Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Have a Juvenile Record in Kansas?: Plan for Your Future
• Have a Juvenile Record in Maryland?: Tips for Answering Application and Interview Questions
• Have a Juvenile Record in New Hampshire? Plan for Your Future!
• Helping Traumatized Children: Tips for Judges
• I Got Arrested, Now What? Brochure for Clients (Maryland)
• Identifying Dual Status Youth with Trauma-Related Problems
• Investigation of Compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act at Leflore County, Mississippi, Juvenile Detention Center
• Issue Brief: Using Developmentally Appropriate Language to Communicate with Court-Involved Youth
• Juvenile Defender Delinquency Notebook: Advocacy and Training Guide (2nd Edition)
• Juvenile Defender Disposition Practice Tool
• Juvenile Defender Post-Disposition Practice Tool
• Juvenile Defender Self-Assessment Tool for Best Practices in Detention Advocacy
• Juvenile Defender's Guide to Immigration Issues in Juvenile Proceedings
• Juvenile Defense Attorneys and Family Engagement: Same Team, Different Roles
• Juvenile Facilities Checklist for Defenders: Advocating for the Safety and Well-Being of Transgender, Gender Nonconforming, and Intersex Young People
• Juvenile Facilities Checklist For Defenders: Advocating for the Safety and Well-Being of Young People
• Key Changes to the Kansas Juvenile Code: A Practical Guide
• Legal Strategies to Reduce the Unnecessary Detention of Children: Advocacy and Training Guide
• LGBT Youth in Juvenile Court: Practice Tips for Juvenile Defenders
• Making the Case for Young Clients: Supreme Court Quotes for Bolstering Juvenile Defense Advocacy
• Miller/Montgomery Evaluation Records Request Guide
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Avoiding and Mitigating the Collateral Consequences of a Juvenile Adjudication
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Model Juvenile Court Colloquies
• Montgomery v. Louisiana Mitigation Report
• Motion for Child to Appear Free from Degrading and Unlawful Restraints (Florida)
• National Juvenile Defense Standards
• National Standards for Care of Youth Charged with Status Offenses
• Remote Justice: Communication in the Virtual Courtroom Brief
• Remote Justice: Communication in the Virtual Courtroom Summary
• Resource Brief for Juvenile Defenders: What Juvenile Defenders Should Know about the DSM-5
• Resource Brief-Navigating the Dual Status Terrain: Tips for Juvenile Defenders
• Responding to Youth Disclosures about Trauma: Guidelines for Non-Mental Health Professionals
• Response to People's Motion to Exclude Evidence (Illinois)
• Sample Letter to Department of Children and Family Services
• Settlement Agreement Between the United States and Leflore County, Mississippi
• Template FASD Birth Mother Interview
• Ten Principles for Providing Effective Defense Advocacy at Juvenile Detention Hearings
• Ten Reasons to Ask Clients about Citizenship
• The Court Got It Wrong: Presenting & Winning on Your Theory of Appeal
• The Harms of Juvenile Detention Infographic
• The Ohio Model: A Report on the Transformational Reform of the Ohio Department of Youth Services, 2007-2015
• The Pennsylvania Juvenile Collateral Consequences Checklist
• The Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel at Disposition
• The Supreme Court and the Transformation of Juvenile Sentencing
• The Use of Juvenile Statements Made in Uncounseled Interviews, Assessments, and Evaluations: A Survey of National Practices
• Tips on Youth Trauma for Juvenile Defenders
• Toward Developmentally Appropriate Practice: A Juvenile Court Training Curriculum - Overview
• Trauma-Informed Legal Advocacy: A Resource for Juvenile Defense Attorneys
• Trauma: What Child Welfare Attorneys Should Know
• United States Department of Justice Investigation of the Shelby County Juvenile Court
• Unlocking Youth: Strong Juvenile Defense
• Washington Judicial Colloquies Project: A Guide for Improving Communication and Understanding in Juvenile Court
• What Young People Are Saying About Juvenile Defense: Learning from the Experiences of Former Youth Clients
• Writ of Habeas Corpus (Louisiana)
• Writ of Habeas Corpus (New York)
• Your Juvenile Record Can Affect Your Future Brochure
• Youth Homelessness Infographic
Show all articles ( 89 ) Collapse Articles

Racial Justice Toolkit

9

• Case Advocacy

  1

• Community Education

  2

• Confronting Bias

  1

• Policy Advocacy

  3

• Social Media Advocacy

  2

Research

22

• A Tangled Web of Justice: American Indian and Alaska Native Youth in Federal, State, and Tribal Justice Systems
• Be Her Resource: A Toolkit About School Resource Officers and Girls of Color
• Criminalizing Normal Adolescent Behavior in Communities of Color: The Role of Prosecutors in Juvenile Justice Reform
• Environmental Scan of Developmentally Appropriate Criminal Justice Responses to Justice-Involved Young Adults
• Generating a Revolution in Prevention, Wellness & Care for LGBT Children & Youth
• Issue Brief: Rethinking Juvenile Detention in Ohio
• Legal Socialization of Children and Adolescents
• Making the Case for Status Offense Systems Change: A Toolkit
• Models for Change Innovation Brief: Using Risk Assessment to Meet Needs and Reduce Recidivism
• Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Correctional Facilities Washington State Department of Health
• Retaining a Forensic Mental Health Expert in Miller Cases
• Reward-Biased Risk Appraisal and Its Relation to Juvenile Versus Adult Crime
• Shackling Children in Juvenile Court: The Growing Debate, Recent Trends, and the Way to Protect Everyone's Interest
• Spotlight on Culture-Conversations about Historical Trauma: Part One
• Spotlight on Culture-Conversations about Historical Trauma: Part Three
• Spotlight on Culture-Conversations about Historical Trauma: Part Two
• Sticker Shock: Calculating the Full Price Tag for Youth Incarceration (2014)
• Studying Deterrence Among High-Risk Adolescents
• The Dangers of Detention: Using Research to Prevent or Limit Juvenile Incarceration
• The Harmful Use of Isolation in Juvenile Facilities: The Need for Post-Disposition Representation
• Violent Death in Delinquent Youth after Detention
• Young Offenders in Custody: An International Comparison of Mental Health Services
Show all articles ( 14 ) Collapse Articles

Trial Manual

43

• 01. Cover
• 02. Table of Contents
• 03. Chapter 1: Nature of the Manual
• 04. Chapter 2: Intro to Delinquency Practice
• 05. Chapter 3: Before the Initial Hearing
• 06. Chapter 4: Initial Hearing
• 07. Chapter 5: Client Interview
• 08. Chapter 6: Case Planning
• 09. Chapter 7: Drafting Motions
• 10. Chapter 8: Investigation
• 11. Chapter 9: Pretrial Discovery
• 12. Chapter 10: Defense Trial Prep
• 13. Chapter 11: Expert Witnesses
• 14. Chapter 12: Mentally Ill & Intellectually Disabled Clients
• 15. Chapter 13: Transfer
• 16. Chapter 14: Guilty Pleas
• 17. Chapter 15: Speedy Trial Motions
• 18. Chapter 16: Motions Hearings
• 19. Chapter 17: Motions to Dismiss
• 20. Chapter 18: Severance Motions
• 21. Chapter 19: Diversion Motions
• 22. Chapter 20: Venue Change, Judicial Recusal
• 23. Chapter 21: Motions Related to Jury
• 24. Chapter 22: Suppression Hearings
• 25. Chapter 23: Motion to Suppress Evidence
• 26. Chapter 24: Statement Suppression Motions
• 27. Chapter 25: ID Suppression Motions
• 28. Chapter 26: Interlocutory Review
• 29. Chapter 27: Trial, General Characteristics
• 30. Chapter 28: Voir Dire
• 31. Chapter 29: Opening Statements
• 32. Chapter 30: Evidentiary Issues
• 33. Chapter 31: Prosecution Witnesses
• 34. Chapter 32: Motion for Acquittal
• 35. Chapter 33: Defense Case at Trial
• 36. Chapter 34: Objections
• 37. Chapter 35: Closing Stage of Bench Trial
• 38. Chapter 36: Closing Stage of Jury Trial
• 39. Chapter 37: Post-Verdict Proceedings
• 40. Chapter 38: Dispositions
• 41. Chapter 39: Appeal & Post-Disposition Proceedings
• 42. Table of Authorities
• 43. Index
Show all articles ( 35 ) Collapse Articles