Blog
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
We broadcast Summit from Puerto Rico so we could dance bombas, drink pina coladas, and revolutionize youth defense, and I can confirm we did all of the above.
If you missed Summit, well, you missed a lot. Please make better life choices next year. But the least I can do is rub it in your face with this top 10.
- “He was our dragon.”
Julian Claudio Gotay did not oversell Senator Jose A. Vargas Vidot.
- “Rebellion is built on hope.”
There were a few pearls of wisdom dropped during the state court advocacy panel, but this one from Bob Chang of the Korematsu Center stuck with me. That, and when Brooke Burns said we have to “Take what is given to us and use it . . . even if it is a pile of poo,” when discussing Second Amendment and equal protection arguments.
- “‘Oscar needs to clean up that garbage can.’ No, Oscar needs stable housing.”
Professor Pinckney on his Oscar the Grouch t-shirt.
- HyeJi Kim devotees
The rest of the community got to see what we at Team Gault have been celebrating all year, which is the arrival of HyeJi Kim. I haven’t felt so amped about Department of Justice investigations since, well, HyeJi taught me about them six months ago.
And in response to your tweet, Angela Chang, yes, we can start a fan club.
- “Eighty-five percent of counties do not have access to abortion care, and 66 clinics have shuttered their doors post-Dobbs.”
Laura Cohen giving the disclaimer that she is “no reproductive rights expert” and then expertly and completely terrified us with her Handmaid’s Tale recap of the landscape of youth defense following the Dobbs decision.
- Gault Fellow All-Stars
You might not have met our Gault Fellows because they were busy working the AV table and facilitating the Youth Experiential Learning Simulation and checking people in and running virtual workshops. One of our fellows even has her own entrance music for team meetings.
- The fa-shun
Was there a panelist with rainbow socks peeking out from his suit pants? Yes. Were there outfit changes throughout the day? Sí. Was there an offer from Telfar Clemens to send me a Telfar bag to carry at next year’s Summit? No. Not yet.
- The community
You know those great black and white photographs that surface of Eartha Kitt and James Dean playing bongos together at some party in the 50s, or Elvis at the White House with Richard Nixon? That is the vibe this photo gives me.

- The jams
The Gault Center is nothing if not exhausted intentional. I double-dog dare you to listen to our Summit playlist and not be firmly convinced you can single-handedly take on the system.
- The little nonprofit that did
Eleven women pulled off a hybrid virtual and in-person Summit for more than 530 people. All 50 states and three territories were represented. Heck, not even an unstable power grid or an actual hurricane could stop us. We don’t just think we can, think we can, think we can . . . we know we can.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
This is not a drill. May 15 is Gault Day! Mark your calendars.
Passover brings matzah, the Eid new clothes, Christmas brings my father commiserating with Ebenezer Scrooge while watching A Christmas Carol. Each holiday has a tradition! The Gaultiversary deserves no less.
But how does one celebrate the seminal case that contained such bangers as: “So wide a gulf between the State’s treatment of the adult and of the child requires a bridge sturdier than mere verbiage, and reasons more persuasive than cliché can provide.”1
Much like wedding anniversaries, each year fighting for youth rights means a traditional gift for the defender. Twenty years in youth defense, like myself, means you buy yourself china. Side note: Can you microwave Kraft Easy Mac on china? Asking for a friend.
I am firmly in the “pro” column for any excuse to celebrate, so let’s party like it’s 1967. (I mean, not really. There was no Kraft Easy Mac in 1967).
1. Take a boxing class!
You need to stay fit to lug those files up to court. Plus, you never know when you’ll have to defend yourself in a kangaroo court.
“Under our Constitution, the condition of being a boy does not justify a kangaroo court.”2
2. Change the batteries in your flashlights.
You never know when the guiding hand of counsel might need guidance.
“The child ‘requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings against him.’”3
3. Buy yourself an ice cream sundae . . . with the “ripest cherries”! Or the “biggest bombers.”
This is why you need confrontation of witnesses . . . and Lost to the annals of time are the contents of that lewd phone call.
4. Rock your swag.
Organizations, nonprofits, and government agencies deserve funding increases and salary increases expressly for youth defense. We are a movement of our own and not a subset of adult defense. And people need to be reminded. Kiddie court? Please see Number One, sir/madame. I just boxed a kangaroo.
5. Prank call a prosecutor.
Ask them if their fridge is running and tell them to go get it. I’m kiddddding. But you just considered it. SMH
6. Get proximate with your clients.
Plan a Know Your Rights seminar, speak at a career day, offer to volunteer at the detention center. I’ve met defenders who taught yoga, led dance classes, ran a woodshop class, and coached moot court teams. Don’t just drive through the community to get to your office.
7. Pay it forward, and pay it back, and pay it sideways.
Reach out to your local law school or undergrad, particularly HBCUs, and affinity bar groups. Mentor upcoming defenders. Reach out to the person who inspires you to be a more zealous defender and take them to lunch.
8. Remember why you became a youth defender.
Because you wanted to light your hair on fire and burn down the patriarchy? Yes! Because you answered a job posting advertised in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution? Yes! Because your report card in elementary school always said, “KK should talk less and stop distracting others during class”? Yes!
As defenders, we represent people and not policies, but while we are here, no reason why we can’t just go ahead and try to disrupt the whole inequitable, rigged system. Our new publication, Cause of Action, will give you a blueprint on how to do it. After reading the draft, my fabulous coworker HyeJi Kim had me convinced I could change the world.
9. Don’t stop learning (and believing and thinking about tomorrow and get it, get it).
Sign up for the Racial Justice Toolkit, schedule a training, join your local Gault Regional Center. And encourage others to do the same. I sincerely hope that counsel in Gault showed up at the Arizona courthouse with the SCOTUS opinion in hand and channeled their inner Good Will Hunting and asked how the Arizona court liked them apples. (Which would have been confusing because Good Will Hunting hadn’t been released in 1967.)
10. Really, just take a bike ride or head to brunch or get your nails done. Or bring bagels to the office. (But only if they are from New Jersey. Other bagels are trash.)
Because you can’t defend from an empty (coffee) cup.
And share a photo of you celebrating your Gaultiversary with #defendyouth @GaultCenter on your social media platforms of choice.
1 387 U.S. 1 at 29-30.
2 387 U.S. 1 at 28.
3 387 U.S. 1 at 36.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
How excited am I that we have our first Black female Supreme Court Justice who is a public defender? (Once a public defender, always a public defender; it’s blood in, blood out.) Very!
But not more than Senator Cory Booker. No one was more excited than Senator Booker.
However, when Justice Brown Jackson wasn’t receiving cartoon heart-shaped googly eyes from Sen. Booker, she was being peppered with, “How can you represent those (::swallows::) people?” (Read: protect a constitutionally mandated right to counsel.) I felt like she was “smizing” right at me, personally, through the camera, as we shared a collective “Pffffft” with the defense community around the nation.
Ted Cruz noted that “public defenders often have a natural inclination in the direction of the criminal.” That our hearts are with the criminals. And, criminal lovers, it’s time that we recognize this.
So, as the Delilah or Casey Kasem for defenders everywhere, I’m sending these top 10 love songs out . . . *dramatic pause* . . . to the “criminals.”
1. Take My Breath Away, Berlin. This beautiful tribute to the moment when a judge, fully prepared to rule against you, begins to embrace your race equity and adolescent development arguments. It’s hotter than the volleyball scene in Top Gun.
2. Sweet Child O’ Mine, Guns N’ Roses. Reminds us that eyewitness IDs are frequently unreliable, and we should test them whenever prudent. Can you describe the person, Axl? She’s got eyes of the bluest skies, and her hair reminds me of a warm safe place. Thank you. No further questions.
3. Our Lips Are Sealed, The Go-Go’s extol their adoration of 5th Amendment rights in this pop classic.
4. Is It a Crime? Sade’s ode to motions to dismiss in the interest of justice is often mistakenly thought to be about love.
5. I’ll Be Loving You (Forever), New Kids On The Block urges us all to commit to post-dispo representation. How long am I your attorney? Just as long as you want me to be. ::swoon::
6. Got To Get You Into My Life, The Beatles. Paul wrote this love song to marijuana. It’s true. Google it.
7. Let’s Stay Together, Al Green. I don’t know how Al knew back in 1972 about the harms of virtual hearings where youth are separated from their attorneys, but he couldn’t be more right.
8. Ain’t No Mountain High Enough, Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell. If you need me, call me, but also can we normalize public defenders taking vacations and recharging and not burning out? Okay? Great. Thanks, bye.
9. (Everything I Do) I Do It for You, Bryan Adams. This slow jam is about the dance youth defenders do, engaging parents and guardians while remaining fierce, expressed-interest, zealous, client-driven advocates. That takes way more skill than when Robin Hood splits the arrow of his opponent to win the tournament.
10. Dreaming of You, Selena. Late at night when all the world is sleeping, I stay up and think of you. Selena really captures that truly blissful, deep REM slumber that you get the night before a big case.
And this last one goes out to all my youth defenders out there. From me, to you:
Crazy Little Thing Called Love, Queen. For you who remain ready (Ready, Freddy!) to do every crazy little thing in defense of children.
Dear K.K.,
My dear client has a love-hate relationship with his school district. He is currently at an alternative school. One day in January, he left his school and entered the main high school. He was let in by another student and bypassed the metal detector. He wandered the school, entering classrooms and generally raising a ruckus. The school is aware that he has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, other mental health concerns, and a learning disability.
The school called the police to take him to the precinct so that his mother could pick him up. After my client exited the school building and as he was about to enter the police vehicle, the school security guard grabbed his duffle bag from him and took it back into the school building.
The police took my client to the station and later received a call from the school security guard, stating that he searched my client’s bag and found four BB guns. The police were not going to charge my client for entering the main high school, and only charged him once the security guard informed them of what he “found” in the bag.
Is this a legal search? Does the school’s authority end once the police have taken responsibility for the client? What would T.L.O.[i] say about this?
Sincerely,
I Want an Official Red Ryder Carbine-Action Two-Hundred-Shot Range Model Air Rifle
Dear Red Ryder,
Ya know why I chose your letter? It’s the “Is this a legal search?” followed by a compelling argument as to why it most certainly is NOT a legal search, you saucy defense minx! I am here for it!
But why must you breaka my stride by mentioning T.L.O.? It is my third most angering Jersey reference, behind when people say Joisey, ask “what exit,” or compare Springsteen to Billy Joel. (One is a national treasure who wrote Thunder Road and the other is Billy. Joel.)
But, I digress. T.L.O. says decreased protections for students, but not no protections for students.
T.L.O. holds that while the 4th Amendment applies to searches by public school officials, no warrant or probable cause is required. Rather, the court adopted a reasonableness test. The search must be reasonable at its inception, and there must be “reasonable grounds” that the search will produce evidence the child is violating the law or a school rule.
In your case, given that the student was no longer in the custody of the school means that the school official’s snatching the child’s bag was completely unreasonable. Further, there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the search would produce evidence of anything related to the “trespass” or “raising a ruckus,” well, cuz those don’t exist in a bookbag. Further, there are no reasonable grounds related to the breaking of any other rules or laws. There was no reason to believe that the youth was involved in anything more than normative adolescent behavior of causing a ruckus and roaming the hallways of a school.
The T.L.O. test of reasonableness, which I think your school gets an F- on, is:
- Was the search justified at its inception?
When the child was with an armed police officer who had decided to drive him to the station so mom could get him? NO
2. Was the search conducted in a scope reasonably related to the circumstances that justified the interference in the first place?
The details will be helpful here, but a zipped bookbag suggested no potential evidentiary connections to the ruckus or the trespass, so there was no scope that would have been reasonable and certainly not rummaging through the bag of a child who had already left the building.
While I like your “end of authority” argument, the details of the search may encourage you to consider the school as an agent of the police by collecting the bag and searching it. That way, you sidestep T.L.O. The lower standard of “reasonableness” covers only “searches carried out by school authorities acting alone and on their own authority” and not to searches carried out by police officers or school officials acting in conjunction with police officers.[ii]
I mean, why didn’t they just have mom come pick him up from the school?
When the judge says, “Counsel, Counsel, Counsel. So a school can never search a student?” (Because they like to exaggerate your position to a place that makes no sense, but they say that part on the inside.) Tell them to compare your little ruckus-maker with A.J.C. in Oregon.
What facts did the Oregon Supreme Court use to determine that the search of A.J.C.’s backpack was reasonable under school safety exception? A report by another student, who identified A.J.C. by name, to have threatened to shoot her and potentially other students on that date. With a gun.
As opposed to your friend, who took an impromptu tour of the larger campus of his school.
Once you get the BB guns suppressed, please file a motion to dismiss any remaining counts as a manifestation of a disability and violative of the state’s juvenile court purpose clause. That will be a nice treat for the State.
To convict the involuntary committee of a quasi-criminal offense for displaying the symptoms of his illness while in a place intended to treat that illness, and upon the complaint of one whose duty it is to have the care and custody of such a patient, imposes punishment where none can either constitutionally or morally be justified. The application of the statute to this defendant under the facts presented not only constitutes a misapplication of the statute but constitutes an unconstitutional infliction of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.[iii]
To be sure, imprisonment for ninety days is not, in the abstract, a punishment which is either cruel or unusual. But the question cannot be considered in the abstract. Even one day in prison would be a cruel and unusual punishment for the “crime” of having a common cold.[iv]
I could groan on and on. Please let us know how it turns out!
Go get’ em!
Respectfully submitted,
KK
[i] New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
[ii] See T.L.O at 341.
[iii] See Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S. Ct. 1417, 8 L. Ed. 2d 758 (1962).
[iv] State v. Cummins, 168 N.J. Super 429 (1979).
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
Once upon a time, there was a curly-haired defender who hated having to play Go Fish about discovery before a transfer hearing:
“Prosecutor, do you have the statement from the store clerk mentioned in the police report?”
“No. Go fish. I don’t plan on using it at the hearing. And this is a preliminary hearing. Your client will get it after the transfer to adult court and indictment. Mwahahahahaha!” ::insert evil mustache twirl::
And this chapped the curly-haired defender’s hide and ruffled her feathers and got her goat and every other angry animal reference. So the curly-haired defender filed a motion, a Motion for Full and Complete Discovery Prior to a Transfer Hearing. And much to everyone’s surprise, including the curly- haired defender, the motion was granted! But instead of a giant packet of discovery landing on her desk, a Notice of Leave for Interlocutory Appeal arrived.
Font size and margins and font type and a pink or green cover page and nine copies and I am the Appellee or the Appellant? And who cares that much about Courier New? Answer: appellate attorneys do.
The fear of creating bad law and having to wander the earth like Dr. Frankenstein’s monster after being shunned by the defense community loomed large.
We waited years as the case snaked through the Appellate Division and the New Jersey Supreme Court. There were many times I worried I had made the wrong decision. And worse, that my client, N.H., who had trusted me completely, was shouldering the ramifications by having to sit, in custody, and wait. Is there anything that keeps us defenders up at night more?
But the New Jersey Office of the Public Defender’s Appellate Division did their thang and it all worked out: a unanimous decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court, opinion written by the Chief Justice, and some of my best amici showed up: Rutgers Law Criminal and Youth Justice Clinic, ACLU of New Jersey, Juvenile Law Center, and a little nonprofit you may have heard of, NJDC.
I recently had the pleasure of participating in NLADA’s storytelling appellate training and remembering how smart appellate attorneys are. I was also reminded of my teeny brush with appellate practice with N.H.1 and why we as frontline defenders should not just be concerned with appeals but be crushing on it hardcore. Appeals as New Kids on the Block. Scream and cry when you pass them in the hallway. Have them autograph your next brief. Like, actually have them weigh in about how you are setting up the record.
This February, make an appellate attorney your Valentine.
1. They are game changers.
Batson, Miranda, Kent, Gault, Simmons: those surnames all mean change, thanks to an appeal.
2. You build toward what you thought might not be achievable.
According to Westlaw, N.H. is cited 43 times in support of applications to expand the rights of a youth facing transfer.
3. You get breadcrumbs from the court about the path to victory.
“Moreover, this case does not properly present—and thus we do not consider—any as-applied Eighth Amendment claim of disproportionality regarding Jones’s sentence.”2
So, you are saying there is a chance, SCOTUS.
4. I mean, you know you’re right, right?
Hey, some hills are worth dying on.
5. Impact litigation.
Brown v. Board of Education was a carefully selected case. You ain’t Thurgood Marshall, but have lunch with our appellate friends and find out what case they think might change the court’s mind in a big way.
6. It improves your trial practice: preserve the record!
Feel free to use a tip a former supervisor taught me: when a judge keeps rushing you and cutting you off, ask, “Are you precluuuuuding me from making a record?” It’s like judge kryptonite. Tell the others.
7. It keeps you humble.
Good golly, Miss Molly, reading a transcript of yourself in court? Dear Elite Transcripts, feel free not to include every one of my “umms.”
8. You are a pivotal part of the appellate team, even if someone else is counsel.
You might be the one explaining the process to the youth and their family. You can explain the trial-court process to the appellate attorney. You hold key facts and information.
Ya know every movie from the 80s where one character interacts with the other character who they don’t think they need in their life because they are so different? That’s us.
9. They are fancy AF.
At the trial level, it’s like Rocky. You’re out there chasing chickens and doing one-handed pushups. Sometimes you just wanna go the distance even if you don’t win. (That’s a lie, we always wanna win, but stay with me.)
Appeals are like the elaborate sword fight scenes from The Princess Bride. I’m pretty sure “may it please the court” loosely translates to “Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die!”
10. We are all in the same gang.
There is no room for East Coast/West Coast beef. Plus, we have prosecutors to gang up on.
I guess I’m just a girl, standing in front of a computer, asking all appellate attorneys if they will accept this rose?
1 State in the Interest of N.H. 226 N.J. 242 (2016).
2 Jones v. Mississippi, 593 U.S._ (2021).
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
Hey, so that holiday break was . . . different. I spent New Year’s Eve doing shots of Pepto with flat ginger ale chasers—a bubble gum guts cocktail (TM pending)—after a truly regrettable, but unforgettable, chicken sandwich. Texting “Happy New Year! Great news, it’s only violent food poisoning, not omicron. xoxo” to friends and family was so on-brand, 2021.
Remember in the Before Times, when strangers kissed and swug (swigged?) from champagne bottles after each other? With their mouths? Their dirty, germy, unvaccinated mouths?
Resolutions are for people who haven’t been playing “virtual, virtual, quarantine” for close to two years. No, we will make revolutions.
1. Be more like Bishop Desmond TuTu
“I wish I could shut up, but I can’t, and I won’t.” Toss that one out the next time the judge and prosecutor try to cut you off in court.
2. Be more like Betty White
Live your life in such a way that if you die at 99, it is still too soon.
3. Be light Be lightning and thunder in the courtroom
Let them know you’re coming with your rumbling and then dazzle them with your strikes.
4. Declutter Clutter your prosecutor’s inbox
With motions, and “requests to be heard,” and follow up e-mails, and discovery demands, and reciprocal discovery, and mitigation information, and . . . .
5. Recite positive affirmations
What we need is awareness, we can’t get careless
You say what is this?
My beloved, let’s get down to business
Mental self-defensive fitness
(Yo) bum rush the show
You gotta go for what you know
To make everybody see, in order to fight the powers that be
Lemme hear you say
Fight the power!
We’ve got to fight the powers that be
“Fight the Power” by Public Enemy
6. Be more active . . . in your community
Public Defenders for Racial Justice, Baltimore Action Legal Team, Know Your Rights clinics, your state SAG. Be a positive and informed voice with the communities you serve.
7. Stop wasting time Start enjoying time
I watched so many “The Twilight Zone” episodes on New Year’s Day, I legitimately feared waking up with a pig nose.
8. Drink less Drink more
Water. Wa-ter. You can’t pour from a dry, dehydrated, ashy cup.
9. Be kind Be kinda a rebel
New year, same youth defenders. Who dis?
10. Lose weight Push your weight around
You’ve got the power! Like Eurodance group Snap! told us in 1990, before it starts gettin’, gettin’, gettin’ kinda hectic, which reform are you bringing to your jurisdiction?
Establishing a minimum age? Ending indiscriminate shackling? Eliminating fines and fees? Stopping the transfer of youth to adult court? Demanding defenders at interrogation? Creating youth defense specialization? Developing a holistic defense team? Addressing racial and ethnic disparities? Advocating for and holding yourself accountable to use youth-affirming language? Closing secure placement?
All of the above?!? (Ding! Ding! Ding!)
For me, I resolve to eat less chicken (::shudder::) and to be less chicken.
We have work to do and, much like my chicken sandwich, 2022 might be regrettable but also unforgettable.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
Christmas songs are weird. Between people demanding figgy pudding and refusing to leave until they get some, to the wildly problematic Baby, It’s Cold Outside. (This maiden aunt’s mind is, indeed, vicious, but it’s because of your inability to understand consent.)
Is it the public defender in me that doesn’t like to throw around the image of conspiring by a fire? (Sherika was today years old when she learned it was “conspire” and not “perspire.”) And I feel for the mom in I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus, caught between being accused of infidelity and announcing Santa isn’t real. Like, let this mom live.
However, nothing is as confusing as the poor recipient of a foul number of fowl in The Twelve Days of Christmas. Your true love brought you seven swans, six geese, four calling birds, three French hens, two turtle doves and a partridge? Weird flex, but ok. Well, our dear defenders, just in time for the holidays, NJDC The Gault Center is delivering The Twelve Days of Yuletide Youth-Tide.
On the first day of winter solstice, the Gault Center gave to me, a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the second day of Feliz Navidad, the Gault Center gave to me, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the third day of Happy New Year, the Gault Center gave to me, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms,[i] two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the fourth day of Christmas, the Gault Center gave to me, four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the fifth day of Festivus, the Gault Center gave to me, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss[ii] . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the sixth day of Kwanzaa, the Gault Center gave to me, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications,[iii] fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the seventh day of Happy BDay Jesus, the Gault Center gave to me, seven new publications,[iv] six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the eighth day of Hanukkah, the Gault Center gave to me, eight judges for our inaugural Judicial Racial Justice Network, seven new publications, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the ninth day of Happy Holidays, the Gault Center gave to me, nine badass regional centers, eight judges for our inaugural Judicial Racial Justice Network, seven new publications, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the tenth day of Season’s Greetings, the Gault Center gave to me, ten things I kinda maybe don’t hate about Jones, nine badass regional centers, eight judges for our inaugural Judicial Racial Justice Network, seven new publications, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the eleventh day of Mele Kalikimaka, the Gault Center gave to me, eleven Amicus Curiae, ten things I kinda maybe don’t hate about Jones, nine badass regional centers, eight judges for our inaugural Judicial Racial Justice Network, seven new publications, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss. . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual Summit that was COVID and variant free!
On the twelfth day of OhPleaseNotAnotherVariantIn2022, the Gault Center gave to me, twelve rescue animals,[v] eleven Amicus Curiae, ten things I kinda maybe don’t hate about Jones, nine badass regional centers, eight judges for our inaugural Judicial Racial Justice Network, seven new publications, six JTIP Train the Trainer certifications, fiiiiiiiiiiive new listservvvvsss . . . four new Gault team members, three state indiscriminate shackling reforms, two Ambassadors for Racial Justice cohorts, and a virtual summit that was COVID and variant free!
Phew! It’s been quite a year, faithful friends who are dear to us, [who will] gather near to us once more. Someday soon, we all will be together, if the Fates allow. (Seriously, who says that?) Until then, we’ll have to muddle through somehow. So, have yourself a merry little new year and whatever else you are celebrating now.
[i] Jodi S. Cohen, Michigan Supreme Court Limits Use of Restraints on Juveniles, ProPublica, (Jul. 29, 2021, 9:08 AM), https://www.metrotimes.com/news-hits/archives/2021/07/29/michigan-supreme-court-limits-use-of-restraints-on-juveniles; Liz Sawyer, Minnesota Lawmakers Could End Routine Shackling of Children in Court, StarTribune, (Jun. 20, 2021, 5:16 PM), https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-lawmakers-could-end-routine-shackling-of-children-in-court/600070297/; Gretchen Schuldt, Judges Ask High Court to Limit Judicial Shackling, Urban Milwaukee, (Sept. 20, 2021, 8:20 PM), https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2021/09/20/court-watch-judges-ask-high-court-to-limit-judicial-shackling/.
[ii] Arj2021, Arj, Njjuvdefend, JRJN, and YouthDefenseSocialWorkers.
[iii] Texas, Wisconsin, Maryland, South Carolina, Multi-Region, and ARJ.
[iv] Have a Juvenile Record? Plan for your Future! A Guide to Consequences of a Juvenile Record in Massachusetts, Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr., (2021); Have a Juvenile Record? Plan for your Future! A Guide to Consequences of a Juvenile Record in Texas, Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr., (2021); Due Process in the Time of COVID-19 Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr., (2021); Futures in the Balance Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr. et al., (2021); Joint Statement on the Importance of Specialization of Judges, Prosecutors, and Defenders in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings Fair & Just Prosecution, Nat’l Council of Juv. & Fam. Ct. Judges & Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr. (2021); Seeing What’s Underneath: A Resource for Understanding Behavior & Using Language in Juvenile Court Fair & Just Prosecution, Geo. L. Juv. Just. Initiative, Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr. & Nat’l Council of Juv. & Fam. Ct. Judges, (2021); Juvenile Defender Resource Guide, Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr, (2021).
[v] Cosmo Scali, Biggie Smalls Kersey, Weaver Gilbert, Twist Shnider, and Chili, Titus, Mika, Mookie, Kipper, Mullowney, Franklin, and Pepper Borror.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
Several Thanksgivings ago, perhaps fueled by too many Hallmark movies, I suggested we go around the table and say what we were thankful for. I was feeling misty-eyed, Norman Rockwell, The Best Man Thanksgiving vibes until we got to my four-year-old nephew, who asked if I was thankful my dog had died. Now first, my dog had not, in fact, died and second, I’m sorry, what?!
Regardless of Thanksgiving’s violent and complicated history and your family’s earnest attempts at continuing that trend, I will still use this opportunity to talk about what I am grateful for as a youth defender.
- My new dog is very much alive. The silver lining of lockdown was that many of us added four-legged friends to our families. Mine was a chihuahua/min pin mix with a broken back. He now rules the dog park and jumps onto my chair to appear on Zoom. In the immortal words of Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino from Jersey Shore, the comeback is always greater than the setback, and having Biggie as co-counsel is pretty sweet.
- Defenders are essential and creative. No one banged pots for us in appreciation, but defenders showed up during this pandemic, pushing for youth to be released from detention centers, residential placements, and prisons. We demanded that liberation keep happening, with many of us risking our own mental and physical health to ensure that it did.
- That one supervisor that says, “go for it.” File that motion, retain that expert, try that theory, start that practice. State budgets and public defense budgets aren’t always flush, but it’s great when you have a leader who leads.
- A truly outstanding trial partner. Mine went into labor and we rode by ambulance to the hospital when her water broke right before the judge came out to call the list. Also, the one who came to pick me up from the hospital when I realized I had left my keys and wallet in the courtroom.
- That place you grab lunch or coffee that knows your order. Over the years, our local haunts in Newark changed, but it’s comforting that with the chaos of a court day, someone remembers that you like your sandwich roll scooped or saves you the last oatmeal chocolate chip cookie or warns you if the tuna isn’t fresh.
- Our clients. The one who gives you attitude but then grows to respect you. The one who teaches you new slang, a new perspective, or a lesson. The one who lets you know, although they don’t owe you access to their personal life, at some future date, how well they are doing. It is humbling to be a youth defender.
- That one outlandish attorney for whom you have a nickname. My one regret is that I left the front lines before becoming older and more eccentric. There was one attorney who wore a bolo tie, which would have been cool if he were in the Southwest or Bruce Springsteen in the mid-80s, but alas, he was neither. Honorable mention to counsel who appeared in a velour tracksuit.
- When something really ridiculous happens in court and you just can’t hold it in. My favorite SNL skits are the ones where the cast breaks character and laughs. Court is important, serious, life-changing stuff; however, once in a while, humanity creeps in. Like when I inadvertently opened Spotify while putting my hand in my pocket. It took a few seconds longer than I’d like to admit to realize I was the one blasting Jody Watley. I’m looking for a new love, baby, yeah yeah yeah.
- When you feel seen. I joked that 2020 was a good year for youth defenders, from all the Netflix docs to Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, and everyone on my social media feed realizing how badass youth defenders are.
- When you realize that it takes a village . . . and you found your village. I joined the all-star, badass, all-woman powerhouse that is NJDC. Like the Wizardesses of Oz. Pay no attention to that woman behind the curtain, we are the great and powerful soon-to-be Gault Center.
Please @njdc for what you are thankful for as a youth defender.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
When I was in high school a group of friends and I went to track down “Hookerman” on some abandoned train tracks in Northwest New Jersey. The story was that a train conductor lost his hand taking mail bags off hooks at the train depot and his ghost walked the abandoned tracks looking for his lost hand.
I learned a few things that day: 1. Hookerman is real. 2. Despite what I tell my trainer, I am, in fact, very capable of sprinting. 3. Your friends are not ride or die, they are at best ride or “until we see an unexplainable green orb and are convinced you will die.”
Well, gather nigh, youth defense advocates and let me tell you some other truly terrifying tales from the vault, er, Tales from the Gault that will haunt you.
- Some states allow children to appear in court without an attorney. 1
That’s right. We have laws that prevent kids from gambling, vaping, smoking, working full time, driving cars, owning a gun, marrying, purchasing alcohol, and seeing a woman’s nipples, but to appear in an incredibly complicated court hearing requiring legal knowledge outside the keen of the average intelligent adult? Sure. The defense table is right up there, buddy.
- Courts saddle children with fines and fees even though they aren’t even old enough to get jobs. 2
Prior to reform in New Hampshire, for example, families were billed for every contact with the system, from diversion ($100-200 a case) to appeal ($2,000 a case) and everything in between, including interpreters ($40.07 per hour), counseling ($21.12-85.60 an hour), residential placement ($201.93-788.59 a day), inpatient psychiatric care ($27.20 a day), and incarceration ($27.20 a day).3
States charge families to incarcerate their children. What in the systemic racist capitalist hell is that?
- Children are regularly shackled, often indiscriminately.
As a youth defender, I once interviewed a client while he was sitting on his mom’s lap. The ridiculousness of the moment did not escape me. Most states do not have a minimum age of prosecution, which means that children of any age might be arrested and handcuffed. Even scarier is that in 2019-2020 we saw a 24 percent increase in police intervention with children in crisis who were being brought to a hospital for evaluation.
“Around 10 percent of these students in crisis were handcuffed, including numerous instances where children under the age of 13, including five, six, and seven-year-olds, were handcuffed before they were forcibly removed from a classroom for evaluation.”4
It isn’t only very young children or developmentally, emotionally, or cognitively different children who shouldn’t be handcuffed. Children who pose no risk to their safety or the safety of others are also indiscriminately shackled.5 And when I say shackled, I’m not talking just about handcuffs, there are leg irons, belly chains, leather waist belts to loop the manacles together and, in an image that harkens back to slavery, young Black children shackled to each other in a line during transport to and from court.
- Every state prosecutes children in adult court.
Every state has a mechanism by which youth may be tried as adults, yet no state has a provision that an adult can be tried as a youth. Well, of course not. That would be silly, you might say, because even if adults act very childish, they are still adults, and we can’t try and parse out which adults are acting so childish such that they would qualify to be tried as children! Right. Exactly. Soooooo how are we cool with trying youth “as adults”?
- In many courts across the country, there’s no specialization of or required training for youth defenders.
Ya know when someone calls you to ask your opinion because you are a lawyer . . . but it’s on tax law or employment or nuclear (which is a thing, my friend specializes in Nuclear Law) and you have no clue how to give them advice, so you tell them to call a tax lawyer, employment lawyer, or Jodi, my friend who does Nuclear Law? Like that, because if you aren’t trained and you don’t know what you’re doing, a child could go to jail.6
- The superpredator myth persists.
America still sees Black youth as more violent, more dangerous, and less deserving of an adolescence.
[E]ven as youth arrests and juvenile detention have gone down all across the country, disparities in the way we treat Black and White youth have held fast or continue to grow. Black youth were arrested at a rate 1.6 times that of White youth in 1980, 2.1 times that of White youth in 2008, and 2.6 times that of White youth in 2018 After arrest, Black youth are more likely to be detained, prosecuted, and punished more harshly—even when they are charged with similar offenses and have similar prior histories. Even when White youth do exceptionally violent things, we still treat them like children.
The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth, by Kristin Henning7 (a.k.a. required reading for every youth defense advocate)
- Children are sent to for-profit detention centers.
As of 2018, 40 percent of residential detention facilities in the U.S. were private, housing 27 percent of youth.8
Which makes it even harder to find out about all the nefarious things that are going on there. Like the murder of 16-year-old Cornelius Frederick during a restraint in the cafeteria at Lakeside Academy in Michigan for throwing a sandwich.9
- We don’t give a fig about a child’s education needs if they are accused of a crime.
At least one in three youth in the juvenile legal system has a disability qualifying them for special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)—nearly four times the rate of youth in public schools. Less than half receive special education services while in custody.10
- Miller himself, like many children in Miller resentencing hearings, was resentenced to die in prison. 11
That’s right, Evan Miller, who at 14 was the youngest person sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in Alabama, and the one whose case we cite to in our pleas to free our own clients, was resentenced to LWOP.
- We still don’t know what we don’t know.
Data is unavailable and stale and not collected and fudged. What’s worse is when it is ignored.
We have a lot of work to do, family. So dress up like a sexy or a scary youth defense advocate for Halloween and egg the patriarchy.
1 Nat’l. Juv. Def. Ctr. Defend Children (2016), https://www.defendyouthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Defend-Children-A-Blueprint-for- Effective-Juvenile-Defender-Services.pdf.
2 Our friends at Juvenile Law Center started a national campaign on this very topic: https://debtfreejustice.org/.
3 Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr., Undervalued: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Counsel in New Hampshire 58-59 (2020), https://www.defendyouthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/NewHampshire-Assessment-Web.pdf.
4 Zac Ntim, Children as Young as 5 Years Old are Being Handcuffed and Removed from New York’s Schools by Police, Insider, June 5, 2021, https://www.businessinsider.com/children-young-as-five-handcuffed-and-removed-from-nyc-schools-2021-6.
5 Nat’l Juv. Def. Ctr., Campaign Against Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling fact sheet (2016), https://www.defendyouthrights.org/wp-content/
uploads/2016/03/CAIJS_Shackling-and-Courtroom-Safety-3.4.16.pdf.
6 Bernard Snell, Statement of Interest of the United States: N.P. et al v. State of Ga., et al, (2015), https://www.defendyouthrights.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/03/DOJ-Statement-of-Interest-in-NP-v-State-of-Georgia-Filed-Copy.pdf.
7 The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth, available at: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/ books/623467/the-rage-of-innocence-by-kristin-henning/, xvi (internal citations omitted).
8 https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/corrections/qa08502.asp?qaDate=2018
9 Franco LaTona & Jos Fox, ‘I Can’t Breathe’: Hidden Abuse in Some Private Detention Centers, News 21: Kids Imprisoned, August 21, 2020, https://kidsimprisoned.news21.com/for-profit-juvenile-detention-centers/.
10 Children’s Def. Fund, The State of America’s Children 2021 (2021), https://www.childrensdefense.org/wp-content/ uploads/2021/04/The-State-of-Americas-Children-2021.pdf.
11 Jones v. Mississippi, 593 U.S. (2021) ; Kent Faulk, Evan Miller, Youngest Person Ever Sentenced to Life Without Parole in Alabama, Must Remain in Prison, Al.com, Apr. 27, 2021, https://www.al.com/news/2021/04/evan-miller-youngest-child-ever- sentenced-to-life-without-parole-in-alabama-must-remain-in-prison.html.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
I always loved back to school. It was a time of Lisa Frank, Trapper Keeper, and weirdly attractively smelling erasers. Teachers, the Dow Jones of school supplies, forecasted how many pencils I would need.
Back to school in 2021 might look different—I’m taking my nephew back-to-school shopping on Saturday, and so far the only thing on his list are Yeezys, which he assures me are necessary for gym class. He’s 10, and the public defender in me respects his willingness to advocate, even in the face of obvious defeat.
As you “like” all those adorable first-day-of-school photos flooding your timeline, let’s think about what supplies you might need to get ready for back-to-school advocacy.
And defenders, in honor of your first day of school advocacy, I have packed you a delicious justice, lettuce, and rights sandwich with the crusts cut off.
- We start with a nice base, the bread of your choice, with the well-settled doctrine that “students do not ’shed their constitutional rights . . . at the schoolhouse gate.’”[1]
- But sometimes it’s seeded bread and it just jams right into your wisdom tooth, like the fact that over $2 billion has been spent placing school resource officers (SROs) in schools over the past two decades,[2] which has contributed to the criminalization of normal adolescent behavior. While youth crime rates have steadily declined since the 1990s,[3] during the 2015–2016 school year, schools referred approximately 204,000 students to law enforcement, and approximately 52,000 students were arrested on school property during the school day or at a school-sponsored event.[4] Shockingly to none of you, youth of color bear the brunt of this criminalization.
We defenders are like welders that are sealing off the school-to-prison pipeline. But ya know, like sexy welders, like in Flash Dance.
- Then you add the mayo, schools as “substitute parents.” And courts, like people, are split on whether it’s gross or not. TLO makes clear that school officials have a responsibility to protect students, but underscore that they are state actors and not surrogate parents and therefore, they cannot claim immunity from the protections of the Fourth Amendment.[5] While the Supreme Court in TLO failed to reach the issue of whether the exclusionary rule applies to the fruit of unlawful searches or seizures conducted exclusively by school authorities, lower courts have applied the exclusionary rule.[6]
Suffice to say, we at NJDC are so anti-mayo in this analogy that our Executive Director is vegan.
- While reasonable minds may differ regarding mayo, we can all agree that it has no place on a PB&J. (::inbox floods with e-mails from southern defenders advocating the joy of a PBM&J sandwich::) Much like that disgusting combo, searches of children in school has also served up some stomach-turning arguments by the State. The Government has argued that students’ tardiness, students’ special education classification, and a student’s association with ‘wrongdoers’ constitute reasonable grounds for a search in school.[7] Thankfully, the prosecution ate a PBM&J and lost on all of those arguments.
- Geno’s v. Pat’s in Philly, Primanti Bros., Mother’s, Central Grocery, Mr. Beef, Katz’s. We can argue about who makes the best sandwich (the correct answer is White House in Atlantic City), but we can all agree that school searches must not involve strip searches. What’s that, Justice Souter? No, we can’t? Can we agree that they are “categorically distinct” and “requir[e] distinct elements of justification on the part of school authorities for going beyond a search of outer clothing and belongings”?[8] Great.
- Me, I like chips with my sandwich. And nowhere is the “salty crunch” felt more acutely than when you give a child the “choice” to consent to a search in school or to suffer some disciplinary action.[9] When’s the last time you asked permission to use the bathroom?
- And now for the sweet dessert. We aren’t alone. School officials are beginning to question the role they play in the school-to-prison pipeline. Lawmakers are proposing bills that limit federal funding for police in schools and support hiring school counselors and social workers.[10]
- A little sticky love note on school-space custodial interrogation from Justice Kween Sotomayor. D.B., y’all: It would be “nonsensical” to ignore a child’s age. “The effect of the schoolhouse setting cannot be disentangled from the identity of the person questioned.”[11]
Have a great day fighting the man, Love, SS
- To wash it all down, a defender’s favorite beverage, a cool glass of “fact specific.” So many of these inquiries are fact-specific. What was known, by whom, and when. What was the role of the SRO, school official, or police officer in the interrogation or a search? Is a charter school a private institution immune from 4th Amendment analysis? Not if 99 percent of your funding is from state entities!
Some crusty old seasoned defender once told me, “If the law is on your side, argue the law. If the facts are on your side, argue the facts. And if neither are on your side, argue the Constitution.”
- Where do we pack all this information? Into a janky metal lunchbox that springs open the second you hold it upright? No, not us. Yeti and Igloo and Coleman have nothing on us. Hold our thermos, because we will pack all these arguments into a climate-controlled, waterproof, suppression-demanding brief.
Please send and post photos of you on your first day of back-to-school advocacy. #backtodefendingyouthinschool
[1] Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. at 656, 115 S.Ct. 2386 (1995).
[2] Lisa Thurau, Two Billion Dollars Later: States Begin to Regulate School Resource Officers in the Nation’s Schools, A Survey of State Laws, Strategies for Youth, 4 (2019): https://strategiesforyouth.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SFY-Wheres-the-State-Report-May2017.pdf.
[3] The largest drops in violent crime rate and weapons offenses over the past 30 years have been among youth. Jeffrey A. Butts, JohnJayREC — The Research and Evaluation Center at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (2019): https://johnjayrec.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/databit201901a.pdf.
[4] See U.S. DEP’T OF EDUC. OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION, 2015-16 Discipline Estimations by Discipline Type.
[5] New Jersey v. T.L.O, 469 U.S. 325, 333,336-37 (1985).
[6] See, e.g., In re William G., 709 P.2d 1287, 1298 n.17 (1985); R.S.M. v. State, 911 So.2d 283 (Fla. App. 2005); State v. Pablo R., 137 P.3d 1198 (N.M. App. 2006); In the Interest of Dumas, 515 A.2d 984 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1986).
[8] [8]Safford Unified Sch. Dist. V. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009).
[9] TLO
[10] “Counseling Not Criminalization in Schools Act” 2021 CONG US S 2125, 117th CONGRESS, 1st Session.
[11] J.D.B. v. North Carolina at 276.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
Some people collect shot glasses or magnets from their travels. Me, I collect enviable local youth defense jurisprudence.
*Due to Covid restrictions, these states were visited via Zoom.
- Washington
Despite what my research—reading Twilight (Team Jacob)—led me to expect, my trip to Washington was devoid of both vampires and werewolves. It was, however, rich in beauty: the giant evergreen trees, the fog over Puget Sound, the caffeine. But nothing as gorgeous as the state’s deposition rule.[1] While talking trial prep with seasoned Washington youth defenders, they casually mentioned depositions in youth trials. Suffice to say, I was jealous.
- *Alaska
Geographically the largest and the most sparsely populated, Alaska could easily raise opposition to the right to physical presence of youth in court. I mean, they are taking planes to court. Is that Russia I see in the distance? No, it’s the Northern Lights of Justice, highlighting the Alaska Court Rule that requires the right to physical presence.[2] As we emerge from the pandemic, I do not want to hear some tiny state preaching judicial economy. If Alaska can do it, so can you, Rhode Island.
- Vermont
Well, call Bernie, knit me a pair of gloves, and seat me at the Inauguration, because I. am.here.for.it. You’ve read the research: brains are mushy until at least age 25. Vermont expanded their juvenile court jurisdiction up to age 19 in 2020 and will raise it to age 20 effective July 1, 2022.[3] Of course, this comes with some ifs and buts attached, but still a good sign states are starting to listen to what research has been screaming at us. Green Mountain State, I am green with envy.
- *Kansas
Kansas has the right to jury trials for youth. The Sixth Amendment promises a jury of your peers;[4] J.D.B. established the reasonable child standard.[5] Could Kansas establish trials for youth by youth? If sophomore-year English class with Lord of the Flies taught me anything, it’s that: 1. Conch shells are incredibly important and 2. Perhaps autonomous decision-making by children isn’t a laudable goal. However, I also saw The Breakfast Club, and I would hope that after an afternoon in youth jury deliberation, we would all learn that each of us is a princess, a jock, an outcast . . . . until then, I will be pumping one fist in the air for Kansas for jury trials in juvenile court.
- Maryland
Maryland defenders are developing and piloting a specialized certification program for youth defenders,[6] and just like Old Bay Seasoning, it’s unique, spicy, and distinctly Maryland. However, unlike Old Bay Seasoning, I love it. Love the idea. Love the concept. Love specialized youth defenders.
- *Illinois
When I was little, my mom frequently made meatloaf. It was the 80s, and I’m sure I’m not the only one with this childhood memory. However, I hate hate hate meatloaf. So on days when my mom made meatloaf for the rest of my family, she would make me a separate dinner of Kersey Burgers. Now, Kersey Burgers were delish. And I was embarrassingly old when it was revealed to me that Kersey Burgers were just patties of meatloaf.
Readers, sometimes it’s okay to lie to children. Oftentimes it is not. Like when you have them in custody and want to put them in jail. Youth lie to police, it’s potential obstruction or false swearing charges. Police lie to youth, it’s sound police investigation using the Reid technique.[7] But Illinois is serving something different, and it ain’t meatloaf. Illinois has become the first state to prohibit police from lying to children during interrogation.[8] Kersey Burgers for everyone!
- *Massachusetts
The UN has called for nations to adopt a minimum age of prosecution of at least 14, and North Carolina is currently set at six. So there may be no Santa Claus in North Carolina, but Massachusetts is on my nice list for setting the minimum age of prosecution at 12.[9] Better yet, they are at the top of the list for setting this standard without any loopholes or exceptions!
- *California
Defenders at interrogation for all children under 18.[10] Boom. That is a game changer. Like Sandy-at-the-end-of-Grease-in-shiny-black-pants game changer. “Tell me about it, stud.” Actually, don’t. Because you have the right to remain silent.
- New Jersey
I’m feeling the high of marijuana decriminalization for youth, and I have a hankering for Taylor ham, egg, and cheese. (South Jerseyans, do not start with the whole it’s called pork roll. This is a professional piece, not an Eagles game, and I don’t want to fight with you.)
New Jersey goes further than any other state to protect youth from MJ juvenile court involvement, even adding a provision to forbid police from telling parents about the first time a kid is caught smoking weed. That lasted for 31 whole days before every parent in the state called Trenton and demanded it be removed.[11] HOWEVER, the new New Jersey laws are clear that the smell of MJ by itself does not establish reasonable suspicion to stop or probable cause to conduct a search for possession, including low-level intent to distribute.[12] Say goodbye to the “odor of raw and burnt green vegetative substance” police reports!
- *Wisconsin
Ever since T-Pain rhymed mansion with Wisconsin, I’ve wanted to visit America’s Dairyland. And Madison and La Crosse are cream of the crop (see what I did there?) when it comes to defunding police in schools and re-funding restorative justice and social work. These conversations aren’t easy, but conducting a district evaluation of the SRO program and recognizing that “markers of the school-to-prison pipeline” existed in their schools and that it was disproportionately impacting students of color[13] is a pretty amazing start.
Disclaimer: I know there are other states with similar provisions that were not mentioned. This list is limited to states I’ve visited. Hopefully, NJDC will be coming to your state soon.
[1] Wash. CRR. 4.6.
[2] Alaska Delinquency R. 3(b), (e). See also Alaska Stat. Ann. § 47.12.110 (West).
[3] Vt. Stat. Ann. tit §33 5201(d). See also Act 201 (S.234) https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2018/Docs/ACTS/ACT201/ACT201%20As%20Enacted.pdf.
[4] Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-2357(a)(1) (West).
[5] J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 131 S. Ct. 2394 (2011).
[6] Award # 2018-ZE-FX-0001, Department of Justice Appropriations Act (2018) Pub. L. No. 115Â141, 132 Stat. 348, 423, https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2018-ze-fx-0001.
[7] John E. Reid & Assoc., https://reid.com/about.
[8] 2021 Bill Text IL S.B. 2122.
[9] Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 119, § 52 (West). See also Minimum Age for Delinquency Adjudication—Multi-Jurisdiction Survey, Nat’l Juvenile Def. Ctr. (2021), https://www.defendyouthrights.org/practice-policy-resources/state-profiles/multi-jurisdiction-data/minimum-age-for-delinquency-adjudication-multi-jurisdiction-survey/.
[10] Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 625.6 (West).
[11] 2020 Bill Text NJ S.B. 3565. See also N.J. Stat. § 2C:33-15 (1)(a).
[12] N.J. Stat. § 2C:33-15 (2)-(3).
[13] Sarah Schwartz, Stephen Sawchuk, Eesha Pendharkar, & Ileana Najarro, These Districts Defunded Their School Police. What Happened Next?, EducationWeek: School Climate & Safety (June 4, 2021), https://www.edweek.org/leadership/these-districts-defunded-their-school-police-what-happened-next/2021/06.
by Kristina “KK” Kersey, Sr. Youth Defense Counsel
When I first read Jones,2 I said a bad word. Now, this isn’t what we in the biz would call aberrant behavior, as I am from New Jersey. However, really, Kavanaugh?!
It is hard to accept any perceived step back when we still have so much more to accomplish in the sphere of youth defense. To make myself feel better, I compiled a list of ten reasons why Jones isn’t so bad.
Read: It is so bad and sometimes I read it backwards to pretend that Justice Kween Sotomayor’s dissent is the opinion.
1. It doesn’t disturb Miller or Montgomery.
So, there is that. We still have that rock solid foundation to build on. And such delicious language from these cases and their progeny to cite from:
First, children have a “lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility,” leading to recklessness, impulsivity, and heedless risk-taking. Second, children “are more vulnerable to negative influences and outside pressures,” including from their family and peers; they have limited “control over their own environment” and lack the ability to extricate themselves from horrific, crime-producing settings. And third, a child’s character is not as “well formed” as an adult’s; his traits are “less fixed” and his actions less likely to be “evidence of irretrievable depravity.”3
I feel like someone else said that? Oh, right, defenders did. Every day. In juvenile delinquency court.
2. It allows states to provide additional limits.
I know, know, but as a proud New Jerseyan (Bruuuuuuuce), I implore you to read Zuber,4 which expands Miller into functional LWOP sentences, and from Washington, In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Monschke,5 which applies the state constitution to expand Miller’s prohibition of mandatory LWOP sentences from age 18 to age 21.
And these cases aren’t outliers. In addition to the Garden State and the Evergreen State, 23 other aptly nicknamed states and the District of Columbia (which should be a state, but more on that later) have eliminated JLWOP.6
3. “Permanently incorrigible” stinks and is a red herring.
Permanent?! At 15? At 15, I wore Hammer’s baggy pants, which made me look like I had a soggy diaper.
All this to say, people are capable of change. Just like you rolled your eyes at number 2, I posit whether our path forward in youth justice should be reliant on a judge who heard all the gory details of a trial to not find a youth permanently incorrigible. Especially given what we know about implicit (and explicit) racial bias and structural racism.
The harm from these sentences will not fall equally. The racial disparities in juvenile LWOP sentencing are stark: 70 percent of all youths sentenced to LWOP are children of color. The trend has worsened since Miller v. Alabama: 72 percent of children sentenced to LWOP after Miller were Black, compared to 61 percent of children sentenced before Miller.
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting.7
Preach, Kween.
To poke at the herring even further, incorrigible?! We chose a standard that is inconsistent with the science that brought us here. Graham emphasizes this exact point when citing from Workman V. Commonwealth: “Incorrigibility is inconsistent with youth.”
How can we label a youth as “incapable of being corrected,” “not manageable,” or, if you really want to scream, “bad beyond correction or reform?” The standard says more about our incapability—better said, our unwillingness—to help those deemed “incorrigible” than it says about any youth facing this standard.
4. Making youth a mitigating factor as opposed to a criteria requiring a finding of fact regarding incorrigibility leaves the door open for more aggressive and creative arguments, including developmental age as opposed to chronological age.8
In fact, we might argue permanent incorrigibility is inconsistent with the concept of adolescent brain development. Period.
A child’s age is far “more than a chronological fact.”9 It is a fact that “generates commonsense conclusions about behavior and perception.”10 Such conclusions “apply broadly to children as a class.”11
5. The need for objective criteria and national consensus in favor of criterion would restrain progressive states from being change agents and shackle us to those resistant to wholly embracing adolescent brain science.
I’m looking at you, Arizona.
6. Youth as a mitigating factor allows for wide discretion as to weight and is given wide latitude of discretion as opposed to factual findings underpinning a decision on criteria.
Miller cited Roper and Graham for a simple proposition: Youth matters in sentencing. Therefore, we can be greedy about how much it matters. And if successful in convincing our judge, the decision is unlikely to be disturbed.
Even when state law requires a sentencer to supply reasons, many States do not impose a formulaic checklist of topics or a magic-words requirement with respect to particular mitigating circumstances. And appellate courts do not necessarily reverse merely because the sentencer could have said more about mitigating circumstances.12
7. We can use Jones as a springboard for social workers and mitigation specialists.
Buried in a footnote is the assertion that “in that highly unlikely scenario, the defendant may have a potential ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, not a Miller claim—just as defense counsel’s failure to raise relevant mitigating circumstances in a death penalty sentencing proceeding can constitute a potential ineffective-assistance-of-counsel problem, not a Woodson/Lockett/Eddings violation.”13
8. It reminds everyone that even the most conservative Justices agreed that you cannot ignore age when sentencing a youth.
Like, allllll the conservative Justices.
9. The Court leaves open the possibility of an “as-applied Eighth Amendment claim of disproportionality.”
(“A State is not required to guarantee eventual freedom,” but must provide “some meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation.”) By making youth (and all that accompanies it) irrelevant to imposition of that harshest prison sentence, such a scheme poses too great a risk of disproportionate punishment.14
10. We are finally starting to talk about ACEs (adverse childhood experiences) and trauma in relation to violent offenses committed by youth.
Even if it appears in a footnote . . . in the dissent. “[E]levated adversity scores are as common among killers as they are rare in the general adolescent population.”15
If all else fails, scroll to the dissent, pour yourself a glass of McBride Sisters’ Black Girl Magic Rosé, and remind yourself that you are 2Legit 2Quit.
2 Jones v. Mississippi, 141 S. Ct. 1307, 1334, 209 L. Ed. 2d 390 (2021).1 Huge thanks to Dara Giannantonio, NJDC Summer 2021 law clerk, for her help tracking down all the cases cited in this piece.
3 Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S. Ct. 2455, 2458 (quoting Roper, 543 U.S., at 569, 125 S.Ct. 1183; alterations, citations, and some internal quotation marks omitted).
4 State v. Zuber, 227 N.J. 422, 152 A.3d 197 (2017).
5 197 Wash. 2d 305, 482 P.3d 276 (2021).
6 Josh Rovner, Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview, THE SENTENCING PROJECT (May 24, 2021), https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/juvenile-life-without-parole/.
7 Jones at 1334, internal citations omitted.
8 See State in Int. of Z.S., 464 N.J. Super. 507, 237 A.3d 344 (App. Div. 2020).
9 Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 115, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982); accord, Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.
38, 58, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 569, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1
(2005); Johnson v. Texas, 509 U.S. 350, 367, 113 S.Ct. 2658, 125 L.Ed.2d 290 (1993).
10 Alvarado, 541 U.S., at 674, 124 S.Ct. 2140 (BREYER, J., dissenting).
11 J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261, 272, 131 S. Ct. 2394, 2403, 180 L. Ed. 2d 310 (2011).
12 Jones at 1321.
13 Cf. Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U. S. 510, 533–538 (2003) (counsel in capital case was ineffective for failing to investigate and present mitigating evidence at sentencing).
14 Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S. Ct. 2455, 2469.
15 Jones at 1341.