Conflicts of Interest

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

People v. Austin M., 975 N.E.2d 22 (Ill. 2012)

Categories: , ,

“Children are Different” and Their Lawyers Should Be Too

Categories: ,

Abstract:  “Nearly sixty years ago, In re Gault guaranteed children in juvenile court the right to counsel. However, Gault fell short. While recognizing children’s distinct vulnerability, the Court created a right for children that is weaker than that of adults and failed to recognize how youth in fact require a more expansive right to counsel. Grounded in the stories of…

[Missouri] St. Louis County Family Court: Settlement Agreement 

Categories: , ,

On December 14, 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with the St. Louis County Family Court to remedy  constitutional violations. The settlement agreement covers policies and practices to ensure the due process and equal protection rights of all youth are upheld. This includes early appointment of youth defense counsel, prohibition…

[Missouri] St. Louis County Family Court: Investigation 

Categories: , ,

On July 31, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice released its investigation findings into the St. Louis County Family Court, finding due process and equal protection violations. The findings include right to counsel violations by denying constitutionally adequate defense representation, privilege against self-incrimination violations by requiring a child to admit to allegations for diversion, inadequate…

Loyola Civitas Childlaw Center, Children and Family Justice Center et al. Amicus Brief, Illinois v. Austin M. 

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by Loyola Civitas ChildLaw Center, Juvenile Law Center, The Gault Center, and others argues there is a per se conflict of interest when a child’s defense attorney also acts as their guardian ad litem. The brief argues the guardian ad litem’s ethical and legal obligation to act in the child’s “best interest”…