The Miller Trilogy, Jones, and the Future of Juvenile Sentencing and Constitutional Interpretation in the Post-Jones America

Categories: ,

The end of “permanently incorrigible”: Putting Jones v. Mississippi into context

Categories: ,

Still Cruel and Unusual: Extreme Sentences for Youth and Emerging Adults

Categories: , , ,

The evidence provided in this brief supports bold reforms for youth and emerging adults sentenced to extreme punishments.

2023 Youth Policy Advances

Categories: ,

The National Youth Justice Network released a report detailing legislative trends on youth rights from 2023. This report highlights key gains made by several states around juvenile court fines and fees, expungement, transfer, and youth interrogation among other issues, and flags several regressive legislative trends rooted in harmful narratives about young people. This overview of…

State of Washington v. Kimonti D. Carter and Shawn Dee Reite

Categories: ,

The Second Look Movement: A Review of the Nation’s Sentence Review Laws

Categories: , ,

This report presents the evolution of the second look movement, which started with ensuring compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Graham v. Florida (2010) and Miller v. Alabama (2012) on the constitutionality of juvenile life without parole (“JLWOP”) sentences.12 This reform has more recently expanded to other types of sentences and populations, such…

Juvenile Life without Parole: Unusual and Unequal.

Categories: , ,

A concentration of a few states has unevenly complied with Miller and the possibility of resentencing provided by Montgomery. Some states have refused to comply at all. This uneven implementation of the Miller decision has a particularly profound impact on racial disparities among those serving JLWOP. An analysis of those deemed worth protecting from JLWOP…

Locked Away for Life: The Case Against Juvenile Life Without Parole for Felony Murder

Categories: ,

This article makes the argument against the imposition of life without parole for young people who commit felony murder using an adolescent development framework. The author analyzes existing case law to outline that, just as the U.S. Supreme Court found the death penalty inappropriate for felony murder and relied on adolescent brain development research in…

Unshackled: Stories of Redemption Among Serious Youth Offenders

Categories: ,

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Miller

Categories: ,

People v. Parks Opinion

Categories: ,

Jones v. Mississippi Opinion

Categories: ,

Montgomery v. Louisiana Opinion

Categories: ,

In the Matter of Monschke Opinion

Categories: ,

Miller/Montgomery Evaluation Records Request Guide

Categories: ,

The Supreme Court and the Transformation of Juvenile Sentencing

Categories: ,

Miller v. Alabama Opinion

Categories: ,

Brief on Behalf of Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (Supreme Court of the United States)

Categories: , ,

Defendant’s Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing (Virginia)

Categories: , ,

Prospects For Developing Expert Evidence in Juvenile “Montgomery” Resentencing Cases

Categories: , ,

Trial Defense Guidelines: Representing a Child Client Facing a Possible Life Sentence

Categories: , ,

People v. Chris Robinson Reply Brief

Categories: , ,

California v. Moffett Amicus Brief

Categories: , ,

California v. Gutierrez Amicus Brief

Categories: , ,

Bunch v. Bobby Amicus Brief

Categories: , ,