14th Amendment

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

Facial Recognition AI

Categories: ,

From the abstract: “The integration of algorithmic decision making and artificial intelligence (“AI”) into facial recognition technology poses new, unprecedented risks to privacy and individual autonomy rights, particularly in urban settings. The murder of Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, in New York City on December 4, 2024, provides a timely case study to examine the…

Sample Motion for Probable Cause Hearing and Motion to Find Juv. R. 7 Unconstitutional

Categories: , , ,

The Ever-Turning Wheel of Servitude: Community Supervision and the Next Iteration of Carceral Economic Exploitation

Categories: ,

Monochromacy of Justice: The Global Cost of Racial Colorblindness

Categories: ,

(Attenuating) the Taint of Poverty: How Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence and the Attenuated Doctrine Lead to Lesser Fourth Amendment Rights for the Poor

Categories: ,

Equity for American Indian Families

Categories: ,

Immature Minds in a “Maturing Society”

Categories: ,

Following the 20th anniversary of the Roper v. Simmons decision that ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for youth under the age of 18, the Death Penalty Information Center released a report on the latest science of adolescent brain development and evolving societal standards that recognize the need for heightened legal protections for 18- to 20-year-olds.…

Sample Motion to Vacate Order Transferring Youth to S.C. Department of Corrections

Categories: , ,

   

 State v. F.S., 2025 Ohio 1251 (Ohio App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Case Law Incorporating Specific Racial Justice Arguments

Categories: , ,

This document is updated regularly to include the latest federal and state caselaw from across the country discussing racial justice issues.

Sample Motion in Opposition of Discretionary Transfer to Criminal Court

Categories: , ,

Sample Motion in Opposition of Mandatory Transfer to Criminal Court

Categories: , ,

Legal Deserts and Spatial Injustice: A Study of Criminal Legal Systems in Rural Washington

Categories: , ,

From the abstract: “This Essay draws on empirical research to compose a sketch of the criminal legal systems of several sparsely populated counties in central and eastern Washington State. The study reveals how, at times, the dearth of attorneys available to do the work of prosecuting and defending criminal cases is subjecting system-involved individuals to…

Fines, Forfeitures, and Federalism

Categories: ,

   

“It Don’t Matter Anyhow”: How the Americans with Disabilities Act Has Become (Mostly) Irrelevant to the Criminal Trial Process

Categories:

State and Federal Constitutional Right to Counsel in an Age of Case Specific Inadequacies

Categories: ,

From the introduction: “In this Article, [the author] examines the question of whether state courts, under their state constitutions, may be better suited than federal courts to provide effective remedial measures designed to ensure that criminal defendants receive effective assistance of counsel in criminal prosecutions.”

People v. M.N.B., 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 1591 (Mich. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

On February 28, 2025, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court’s denial of a racial justice expert violated a young person’s due process rights to present a defense. This case involved an altercation between two middle school students involving the use of a racial slur and other racially derogatory comments. Defense counsel…

Post-Commitment Juvenile Attorney Practice Standards

Categories: , ,

2021-2024 Civil Rights Division Highlights Report

Categories: ,

The ACLU of Michigan, et al., Amicus People v. Taylor

Categories: ,

ACLU of Michigan et al., Amicus, People v. Poole

Categories: ,

Ochoa v. State, 707 S.W.3d 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2024)

Categories: , ,

Disability Rights TN v. TN Department of Children’s Services, Class Action Complaint

Categories: , ,

Juvenile Law Center et al., Amicus Brief, People v. Czarnecki

Categories: , ,

DOJ Statement of Interest in J.B.H. v. Knox County

Categories: , ,

From the statement of interest: “The Constitution protects children in juvenile justice facilities from excessive isolation. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits conditions of confinement that are not rationally related to a legitimate government objective or that are excessive in relation to that objective. Plaintiffs, a putative class of children detained at the Mary Davis Detention Home…