Mens Rea
This affidavit relies on adolescent development research to conclude that felony murder should not be applied to youth, given that young people’s ongoing brain and psychosocial development goes against the very premise of felony murder. This affidavit emphasizes how felony murder perpetuates racial disparities and is contrary to adolescent development principles—namely that youth experience more…
From the introduction: “This project, which started in fall 2020, was initially intended to be significantly smaller than it turned out to be. Our coalition of authors intended to outline ways juvenile defenders could streamline their representation of youth charged with sex offenses. As the project gained momentum, this team of trial attorneys, social workers,…
From the Abstract: “Modern doctrine and scholarship largely take it for granted that offenders should be criminally punished for reckless acts. Yet, developments in our understanding of human behavior can shed light on how we define and attribute criminal liability, or at least force us to grapple with the categories that have existed for so…
From the introduction: ” Recent Supreme Court cases have recognized the science underlying the common-sense notion that children are not “little adults.” Their brains function in a completely different manner than those of adults. In 2005, the Court abolished the juvenile death penalty and recognized the neuroscience underlying the claim that those under the age…
A sample motion from Alabama requesting a child-centered mens rea analysis that recognizes the well-established differences between adolescent and adult thought processes and the effect that such differences have on an actor’s state of mind. This motion bases its argument for a child-centered mens rea on reasoning as articulated in recent United States Supreme Court…
In this reply brief, Chris Robinson, a young person tried as an adult in Colorado, challenges his conviction and sentence under Graham and Miller and makes a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The brief highlights in relevant part: “Because the Colorado parole process does not provide the juvenile offender with the full panoply of…
From the introduction: “The authors use a developmental perspective to examine questions about the criminal culpability of juveniles and the juvenile death penalty. Under principles of criminal law, culpability is mitigated when the actor’s decision making capacity is diminished, when the criminal act was coerced, or when the act was out of character. The authors…
The delinquent act itself is often the primary basis for determining intention and competency of children under 18 in adult or juvenile court. But behaviors result from one or more of a diverse range of factors, each of which has different effects on decision-making. The capacity of juveniles to plan or to stop an action…
- « Previous
- 1
- 2