Pretrial Preparation

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

People v. Hill, 2025 IL App (1st) 230604 (Ill. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

The 1st District Court of Appeals of Illinois held that an individual is entitled to a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel where defense counsel failed to communicate sufficiently with their client and investigate a witness that was flagged by the client. The court stated in relevant part: An attorney’s failure to communicate…

People v. Clark-Collins, 572 P.3d 604 (Colo. 2025)

Categories: , ,

In People v. Clark-Collins, the Supreme Court of Colorado remanded the case ordering the district court to amend its standing order on the presentation and scope of testimony and evidence at a reverse transfer hearing as follows:   “While the trial court has significant discretion regarding the presentation of evidence and the application of the rules of evidence, there are limits. In…

“Children are Different” and Their Lawyers Should Be Too

Categories: ,

Abstract:  “Nearly sixty years ago, In re Gault guaranteed children in juvenile court the right to counsel. However, Gault fell short. While recognizing children’s distinct vulnerability, the Court created a right for children that is weaker than that of adults and failed to recognize how youth in fact require a more expansive right to counsel. Grounded in the stories of…

State v. K.A.B., 475 P.3d 216 (Wash. Ct. App. 2020)

Categories: , ,

In State v. K.A.B., the Court of Appeals of Washington held that the youth was entitled to a new capacity hearing based on defense counsel’s failure to thoroughly present a diminished capacity defense and the juvenile court’s application of an incorrect standard for capacity to commit a crime. The court offered the following language in support:  “We reverse K.A.B.’s conviction because she received ineffective assistance of counsel. We…