Identification

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

Unregulated and Unacceptable: Facial Recognition Technology’s History, Privacy Concerns, and Impact on Society

Categories: , ,

From the abstract: “This Note provides a general review of the current state of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT), including Illinois state regulation and past federal regulation attempts. This Note asserts that even as datasets become more diverse and “fairer,” FRT may still have discriminatory impacts on minority populations, as evidenced by a few highlighted examples…

State v. S.H.-M., 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 2317 (Wash. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

An appellate court in Washington reversed a trial court’s denial of a young person’s motion to suppress a firearm as a fruit of an unlawful Terry stop. This case involved misidentification by the police officers of three youth of color and the court stated in relevant part: SH-M argues that the trial court erred when…

Motion for Appropriate Relief- Rejection of Expert Testimony on Cross-Racial ID

Categories: , , , ,

Motion to Prevent In-Court ID of Defendant

Categories: , , , ,

Motion to Suppress Testimony Concerning Certain Out-of-Court Identifications and Prevent Certain Witnesses from Rendering In-Court Identifications

Categories: , , , ,

Suppression Motion Practice in Juvenile Delinquency Cases

Categories: , ,

A practice guide for youth defenders in delinquency cases when litigating suppression issues. This guide covers all aspects of litigating a suppression motion: from drafting the motion, securing witnesses, evidentiary considerations, appellate preservation, and procedural aspects of the suppression hearing that may arise at the suppression hearing, during trial. and on appeal.

Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995)

Categories: ,

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the conviction and death sentence in Petitioner Kyle’s case where the state knowingly failed to disclose evidence favorable to the accused before and during trial. The Court reasoned that because the net effect of the evidence withheld by the state “raises a reasonable probability that its disclosure would have produced…