A Guide to Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Court Involvement in New York

Categories: , , ,

This guide is meant to help young people in New York understand the collateral consequences to juvenile court involvement and adjudications, and what they can do to overcome those consequences. Written in youth-friendly language, this guide walks through how young people should talk about their juvenile court record and the impact of their record on…

The Gault Center and Juvenile Law Center Amicus Brief, Leslie v. New York City

Categories: , , ,

The Gault Center and Juvenile Law Center filed an amicus brief in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals involving New York Police Department’s collection and storage of DNA. From the summary of argument: Amici write in support of Appellant to address the particularly harmful impact that Appellees’ DNA collection and storage practices have on children,…

The Door

Categories:

New York | New York City   Organization Description: The Door provides comprehensive youth development services to address the complex and varied needs of young people ages 12 to 24 throughout New York City. The Door is a youth-centered “one-stop shop” with integrated services including healthcare, mental health care, legal support, education, job training, and assistance…

Matter of Ethan H., 2026 N.Y.App.Div. LEXIS 4427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2026)

Categories: , ,

The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, dismissed a juvenile delinquency petition in the furtherance of justice after consideration of the youth’s developmental disabilities, mental health issues, and childhood abuse and neglect.

People v. Brazeal, 2026 N.Y. LEXIS 1127 (N.Y. 2026)

Categories: , ,

The New York Court of Appeals struck a search condition on a probation order, holding that the condition is not reasonably related to the underlying offense. The court stated in relevant part: As we explained in People v Letterlough (86 NY2d 259, 655 N.E.2d 146, 631 N.Y.S.2d 105 [1996]), “[t]he overriding purpose of imposing a sentence…

Minimal Success: The Consequences of Mandatory Minimums in Youth Sentencing

Categories: , ,

“In New York State, children as young as thirteen can be processed as adults and sentenced to mandatory minimum sentences.  Mandatory minimum sentences require judges to sentence the defendant to a statutorily set minimum term of imprisonment.  Practitioners, judges, and researchers question the efficacy of mandatory minimum sentences, finding that they are ineffective at deterring…

Check the Monitor: Parole & Probation Technologies in Review

Categories: , , , , , ,

From the Introduction of the report by the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley School of Law: “The paper proceeds as follows: • Part I describes current community supervision technologies, including location tracking, alcohol monitoring, and drug testing, and the reliability concerns with each. • Part II describes and compares the…

Juvenile Justice Amici Amicus Brief, New York v. Guerrero

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief from over 26 juvenile justice amici, including the Gault Center, , argues 1) the spirit and text of New York’s passage of landmark Raise the Age Law rejects the attitudes that underlay the Juvenile Offender Act of 1978,  2) New York’s Raise the Age Law and its legislative history demands a youth subject to adult prosecution only in “extremely rare and exceptional cases”, 3) before courts…

People v. Hannah, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Matter of Juan Z., 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3737 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025)

Categories: , ,

U.S. v. Palacios, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96248 (E.D.N.Y. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Matter of A. WW., 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2343 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Matter of Logan R., 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1919 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 2025)

Categories: , ,

In the Matter of Jose M.F., 2025 NY Slip Op 01734 (NY 4th Dept. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Racially Disparate and Disproportionate Punishment of Felony Murder: Evidence from New York

Categories: , ,

Involuntary: How a Lack of Analysis of Age under the Fifth Amendment Highlights the Intersectionality of Age and Race

Categories: , , , , , , ,

Abstract: In the wake of Miller v. Alabama and its progeny, there has been a wider acceptance that juvenile’s need more protections in our judicial system. This is a result of a growing body of research stating that young people’s brains do not fully develop until the age of twenty-five. States across the country are…

Sample Motion Challenging Retention Motions for Adolescent Offenders Based on Gang or Drill Rap Allegations

Categories: , , , , ,

Guidance to Nonprofits Regarding Immigration Enforcement

Categories: , ,

From the introduction: “The incoming federal administration has promised a set of actions focused on mass deportations as well as aggressive and harsh immigration policies. If implemented, the human cost to immigrant New Yorkers will be staggering. Community-based organizations and nonprofits provide mission-driven services to hundreds of thousands of immigrants in the state. Many in…

Developing a Positive Youth Justice System

Categories: , , , , , , , ,

This report from National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform offers six principles of a positive youth justice system (‘PYJS’) including: 1) Minimize contact with the juvenile justice system, 2) partner with youth and families to develop and share ownership of case plans, 3) community-based organizations should take the lead, 4) build on youth assets and…

Protect and Redirect: How to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Juvenile Diversion

Categories: , , , , , ,

Protect and Redirect: Measuring Equity and Results in Juvenile Diversion

Categories: , , , , , ,

Misdemeanor Enforcement Trends in New York City, 2016–2022: Diminished Caseloads and Persistent Racial Disparities

Categories: , ,

Matter of Cody VV., 205 N.Y.S. 3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Categories: , ,

“Two Battlefields”: Opps, Cops, and NYC Youth Gun Culture

Categories: , , , ,

The Center for Justice Innovation conducted an exploratory, participatory action research study of 103 youth ages 15-24  who reported carry guns in a neighborhood of Brooklyn. The research evaluates why these youth carry guns and proposing a collaborative approach to public safety.   From the report: “The increase in gun violence experienced in many U.S.…

Youth Justice in the COVID-19 Pandemic – New York City

Categories: , ,