The Ohio Appellate Court vacated a youth’s convictions and transfer order and offered the following language in support. “Because the juvenile court (1) did not identify all of the factors it considered, i.e., the “other information factors” referenced at the amenability hearing, (2) did not identify or discuss the factual or evidentiary basis for its…
This resource is part of the Youth Defender Advocacy Program (YDAP) curriculum, a specialized trial advocacy training program for youth defenders.
On December 9, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division terminated the consent decree, finding the Ohio Department of Youth Services in substantial compliance with the consent decree. Notable improvements made to the Ohio juvenile facilities include: “meaningful grievance system and easy access to attorneys to address concerns related…
On November 23, 2009, the DOJ and the Ohio Department of Youth Services entered into an amended consent decree to address the remaining conditions of confinement in the Scioto Juvenile Correctional Facility, following the closure of the Marion Juvenile Correctional Facility. Related Actions: [Ohio] Marion Juvenile Correctional Facility: Investigation [Ohio] DOJ Complaint in U.S. v.…
On May 16, 2008, the DOJ filed a complaint against the State of Ohio in the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division for engaging in a pattern or practice of constitutional violations in juvenile facilities. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the state has engaged in a pattern or practice of violating young people’s right to…
On May 9, 2007, the DOJ released its investigation of the Marion County, Ohio Juvenile Correctional Facility, finding that the conditions violate federal and constitutional rights of youth. Specifically, the investigation highlights violations of young people’s right to reasonable safety, right to adequate mental health care, and right to special education services. Related actions: [Ohio]…
On May 9, 2007, the DOJ released its investigation of the Scioto Juvenile Correctional Facility, finding that the conditions violate federal and constitutional rights of youth. Specifically, the investigation highlights violations of young people’s right to reasonable safety, right to adequate mental health care, and right to special education services. Related actions: [Ohio] Marion Juvenile…
In 2002, the Central Juvenile Defender Center, through the Children’s Law Center, Inc. in Covington, Kentucky, in conjunction with the ABA National Juvenile Defender Center and the Juvenile Justice Coalition, Inc. embarked upon a statewide study of Ohio’s indigent juvenile defense system. The study included extensive surveying of judges, magistrates and defense attorneys, and detention…
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
