Template Motion for Youth to Appear in Court Free From Unlawful Restraints

Categories: , ,

A template motion from The Gault Center (formerly National Juvenile Defender Center) requesting a child appear before the court free from unlawful restraints. This is a comprehensive motion that argues unlawful restraints, in the form of a blanket shackling policy, violates the 14th  Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and State Constitutions/State statute as it threatens…

[Kentucky] S.R. v. Kenton County – U.S. Statement of Interest

Categories: , , ,

On October 2, 2015 the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in a federal lawsuit on behalf of two students who were seized and handcuffed by a school resource officer (SRO), alleging violations under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The DOJ asserted that the Sheriff’s…

[Mississippi] City of Meridian, County of Lauderdale, and State of Mississippi: City Settlement Agreement 

Categories: , , ,

On September 18, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with the city of Meridian to address the practice of arresting students in schools. The settlement agreement includes provisions that limit school-based arrests, including “for behavior that is appropriately addressed as a school discipline issue, including incidents involving public order offenses…

[Mississippi] City of Meridian, County of Lauderdale, and State of Mississippi: State Settlement Agreement 

Categories: , , ,

On September 18, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with the state of Mississippi about their probation and diversion practices. The settlement agreement includes provisions on protecting a youth’s right against self-incrimination, requiring probation orders to be written in simple terms to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement, and ensuring the…

[Puerto Rico] Juvenile Facilities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: Investigation 

Categories: , , ,

On August 6, 2015, the DOJ released an updated findings letter on several juvenile facilities in Puerto Rico. The DOJ finds that young people confined in juvenile facilities face substantive due process and equal protection violations, in addition to infringements to their federal rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Rehabilitation Act…

[Missouri] St. Louis County Family Court: Investigation 

Categories: , ,

On July 31, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice released its investigation findings into the St. Louis County Family Court, finding due process and equal protection violations. The findings include right to counsel violations by denying constitutionally adequate defense representation, privilege against self-incrimination violations by requiring a child to admit to allegations for diversion, inadequate…

[Mississippi] Leflore County Juvenile Detention Center: Settlement Agreement  

Categories: , , ,

On March 31, 2011, Leflore County, Mississippi entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the United States to address the DOJ’s investigation findings into the Leflore County Juvenile Detention Center (LCJDC). The MOA outlines that LCJDC must provide young people with reasonably safe conditions of confinement, protect youth from harm, limit the use of…

[Mississippi] Leflore County Juvenile Detention Center: Complaint

Categories: , , ,

On May 12, 2015, the DOJ filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi against Leflore County, Mississippi for engaging “in a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the Constitutional and statutory rights of youth at the Detention Center.” The complaint outlines 14th Amendment violations based on Leflore…

[Georgia] N.P. v. Georgia – U.S. Statement of Interest 

Categories: , , ,

On March 13, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in a lawsuit challenging the deprivation of children’s right to meaningful representation in the Cordele Judicial Circuit of Georgia. In upholding the constitutional necessity of youth defense specialization, the DOJ asserted, “The right to counsel means more than just a lawyer…

An Eighth Amendment Analysis of Statutes Allowing or Mandating Transfer of Juvenile Offenders to Adult Criminal Court in Light of the Supreme Court’s Recent Jurisprudence Recognizing Developmental Neuroscience

Categories: ,

From the introduction: ” Recent Supreme Court cases have recognized the science underlying the common-sense notion that children are not “little adults.” Their brains function in a completely different manner than those of adults. In 2005, the Court abolished the juvenile death penalty and recognized the neuroscience underlying the claim that those under the age…

A First Look at the Plea Deal Experience of Juveniles Tried in Adult Court

Categories: ,

Youth-Specific Jury Instructions (CPCS-Massachusetts)

Categories: , , , , ,

[Michigan] John Doe v. Michigan Department of Corrections – U.S. Statement of Interest

Categories: , , ,

On March 20, 2014, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in a federal conditions lawsuit on behalf young people under the age of 18 confined in the Michigan Department of Corrections, alleging violations of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA). The DOJ emphasizes that “[s]tate correctional facilities. . . are subject to both the…

Juvenile Law Center, The Gault Center et al. Amicus Brief, Ohio v. Quarterman 

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by Juvenile Law Center, The Gault Center, and others argues Ohio’s mandatory bindover statute violates the Due Process protections guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as the mandatory scheme does not allow for individualized sentencing and recognition of the unique characteristics of youth. Further, amici argue individualized transfer proceedings…

Report to Colorado General Assembly on the State of the Youth Defense System in Colorado

Categories: , , ,

Report to Colorado General Assembly on the State of the Youth Defense System in Colorado pursuant to House Join Resolution 13-1019, whose purpose was to “examine and make recommendations on current laws, procedures and practices for the appointment of counsel, advisement of rights and waivers of counsel for children in juvenile delinquency court.” This report…

Children’s Law Center, Inc. et al. Amicus Brief, In re: D.M.

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief prepared by Children’s Law Center, Inc., the Office of the Ohio Public Defender, The Gault Center, and others argues that due process and fundamental fairness, pursuant to the 5th Amendment, the 14th Amendment and Ohio law, require the state to provide full discovery to a young person prior to a probable cause…

Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth, Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Medicine Terry A.Maroney et al. Amicus Brief, Tennessee v. Barnes

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth, Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Medicine Terry A. Maroney, The Gault Center, and others. Amici argue a 16-year-old youth’s waiver of his Miranda rights was involuntary and his confession must be suppressed pursuant to the 5th and 14th Amendments, where he was threatened during…

[Tennessee] Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County: Settlement Agreement 

Categories: , ,

On December 17, 2012, the U.S.  Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with Shelby County and the Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County in Tennessee following their investigation into the juvenile court system. The settlement agreement includes remedial measures to align the following practices with the U.S. Constitution: probable cause determinations, notice…

Gingerich v. Indiana, 979 N.E.2d 694 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

Categories: , ,

The Court of Appeals of Indiana found the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied a 12-year-old’s continuance of his waiver hearing after his attorney only had four business days to investigate and prepare for the hearing. The court reversed the child’s conviction in adult court and remanded the proceeding to juvenile court offering…

[Mississippi] City of Meridian, County of Lauderdale, and State of Mississippi: Complaint

Categories: , , ,

On October 24, 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi asserting that the City of Meridian, County of Lauderdale, and State of Mississippi are engaging in a “pattern or practice of unlawful conduct through which they routinely and systematically arrest and incarcerate children,…

[Indiana] Pendleton Juvenile Correctional Facility: Investigation 

Categories: , , ,

On August 22, 2012, the DOJ released its investigation findings into the Pendleton Juvenile Correctional Facility in Indiana. The investigation finds that “Pendleton exposes incarcerated youth to significant harm in violation of their constitutional and federal statutory rights. Pendleton fails to take reasonable steps to prevent youth from committing suicide, fails to provide reasonably safe…

[Tennessee] Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County: Investigation

Categories: , ,

On December 17, 2012, the U.S.  Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with Shelby County and the Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County in Tennessee following their investigation into the juvenile court system. The settlement agreement includes remedial measures to align the following practices with the U.S. Constitution: probable cause determinations, notice…

In re C.P., 2012-Ohio-1446 (Ohio Sup. Ct. 2012)

Categories: , ,

In the case of  C.P, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that R.C. 2152.86, which created a new class of youth adjudicated of sex offenses who would automatically be subject to mandatory, lifetime sex-offender registration and notification requirements, violated the U.S. and Ohio Constitutions. In its ruling, the Court offered the following language in support: “In…

[Mississippi] Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility: Investigation 

Categories: , , ,

On March 20, 2012, the DOJ released its investigation findings into the conditions of confinement at the Walnut Grove youth Correctional Facility (WGYCF) in Walnut Grove, Mississippi. The investigation concludes, “the State of Mississippi is deliberately indifferent to the constitutional rights of young men confined at WGYCF. Evidence discovered at WGYCF reveals systematic, egregious, and…

Juvenile Law Center and The Gault Center Amicus Brief, G.A.W. v. Illinois

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by The Juvenile Law Center and The Gault Center argues that young people have a constitutional right to a jury trial pursuant to the 6th and 14th Amendment, in cases with serious consequences, such as sex offenses with numerous collateral consequences, in juvenile court, without “comparable adult procedural protections”. Further, the brief…