“Children are Different” and Their Lawyers Should Be Too

Categories: ,

Abstract:  “Nearly sixty years ago, In re Gault guaranteed children in juvenile court the right to counsel. However, Gault fell short. While recognizing children’s distinct vulnerability, the Court created a right for children that is weaker than that of adults and failed to recognize how youth in fact require a more expansive right to counsel. Grounded in the stories of…

Full Briefing on the Unconstitutionality of Georgia’s Statute Criminalizing Handgun Possession for Youth

Categories: , , , , ,

Guilt By Association: How Police Databases Punish Black and Latinx Youth

Categories: ,

From the executive summary: “• Police increasingly replace stop-and-frisk practices with databases that crudely profile Black and Latinx youth based on their neighborhoods, peer groups, and clothing. • These databases ruin lives: police typecast minority youths as gang members without evidence, putting them at risk of false arrest and wrongful deportation. • Many police departments…

Santa Clara County Independent Defense Counsel Office Amicus Brief, People v. Hardin

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by the Santa Clara County Independent Defense Counsel Office argues the decision in People v. Hardin should be affirmed because historical legacies of racism disparately expose some adolescents to the legal system and this does not justify lifelong punishment without considering rehabilitation.  From Introduction & Summary of Argument:  “Youthful offender parole is authorized by age at the…

American Civil Liberties Union, et al. Amicus Brief, People v. Hardin

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by American Civil Liberties Union and others argues that denying an opportunity for parole for young adults between the ages of 18 and 25 raises an equal protection violation given the racially disproportionate impact of life without parole sentences on young adults, resulting from “tough on crime” politics based in racial bias.   From the Introduction:  “In analyzing Petitioner Hardin’s equal protection…

State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: , ,

The Court considers a question of first impression — whether a criminal defendant must be provided in-person interpreting services, rather than video remote interpreting (VRI) services, at his jury trial.

[Louisiana] Alex A. v. Edwards – U.S. Statement of Interest

Categories: , , ,

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in a civil lawsuit addressing the constitutional rights of youth who had been adjudicated delinquent and transferred to the Louisiana State Penitentiary’s former death row building, known as Angola. In their statement, the United States asserted that youth are particularly vulnerable to harmful conditions of…

Amicus Brief from National Association of Judiciary Interpreters & Translators and the American Translators Association in State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: , ,

   

DOJ Dear Colleague Letter on Fines and Fees

Categories: ,

Michigan v. E.E., 346 Mich. App. 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2023)

Categories: , ,

CYAP v. Wilson, 60 F.4th 770 (4th Cir. 2023)

Categories: ,

People v. Heard, 83 Cal. App. 5th 608 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022)

Categories: , ,

Racist Gun Laws and the Second Amendment

Categories: ,

This article traces the history of racist gun laws and how they interact with the Second Amendment,  highlighting the racially disproportionate impact of gun charges on Black and Latine communities. Relevant language from the article includes: “As the courts increasingly look to history and tradition to determine the scope of the right to keep and…

Cause of Action: Fulfilling the Promises of Gault 

Categories: , ,

Creates a case for holding states liable for abdicating their duty to ensure that all children have zealous representation.

[South Carolina] Complaint in U.S. v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice 

Categories: , , ,

On April 14, 2022, the DOJ filed a complaint against the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice for depriving youth confined in the Broad River Road Complex facility of their constitutional rights. The complaint highlights Fourteenth Amendment violations, namely that the Department of Juvenile Justice “(i) failed to reasonably protect children from youth-on-youth violence; and…

[South Carolina] Department of Juvenile Justice’s Broad River Road Complex: Investigation

Categories: , , ,

On April 14, 2022, the DOJ released its investigation findings of South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice’s Broad River Road Complex. The investigation finds “, that there is reasonable cause to believe, based on the totality of the conditions, practices, and incidents, that: (1) the conditions at the Broad River Road Complex (BRRC), South Carolina’s…

[South Carolina] Department of Juvenile Justice’s Broad River Road Complex: Settlement Agreement 

Categories: , , ,

On April 14, 2022, the DOJ entered into a settlement agreement with the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice to remedy conditions that violated young people’s constitutional rights at the Broad River Road Complex facility. The settlement agreement includes provisions that the Department “shall, at all times, provide youth at BRRC with safe living conditions,”…

State v. Thomas, 269 A. 3d 487 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2022)

Categories: , ,

[Connecticut] Manson Youth Institution: Investigation 

Categories: , , ,

On December 21, 2021, the DOJ released its investigation of the Connecticut Manson Youth Institution, finding that the conditions violate young people’s rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. In its Investigation, the DOJ stated “specifically, we find that Manson’s isolation practices and inadequate mental health services seriously…

J.S. v. Manheim Township School District, 669 Pa. 536 (Pa. 2021)

Categories: , ,

Black Attorneys of Legal Aid, the Bronx Defenders, Brooklyn Defender Services, et al. Amici Brief, New York Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen

Categories: ,

This brief by the Black Attorneys of Legal Aid, Bronx Defenders, and Brooklyn Defenders was filed in support of petitioners in the Bruen case. The brief points to the racialized history of denying Black and Latine people lawful licenses to carry guns and outlines racial disparities in gun possession cases. Amici submit this brief “because we…

ACLU and ELC Amicus Brief, J.S. v. Manheim Township School District

Categories: , ,

The Impact of Video Proceedings on Fairness and Access to Justice in Court

Categories: ,

From the introduction: “This paper collects and summarizes existing scholarship on the effects of video technology in court proceedings. Federal courts, immigration courts, and state courts have long used video technology for certain kinds of proceedings. While the available scholarship on the use of video proceedings is limited, existing research suggests reason for caution in…

[South Carolina] Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities v. Cannon – U.S. Statement of Interest

Categories: , , ,

On September 14, 2020, the DOJ filed a statement of interest involving young people between the ages of 11 and 16 subject to “a broad range of unconstitutional conditions, including unsanitary and unsafe conditions, use of excessive force,  overcrowding, lack of recreation and programming, inadequate health and mental health care, and inadequate educational services.” The…

 Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (2020)

Categories: ,