14th Amendment
The Ohio Appellate Court vacated a youth’s convictions and transfer order and offered the following language in support. “Because the juvenile court (1) did not identify all of the factors it considered, i.e., the “other information factors” referenced at the amenability hearing, (2) did not identify or discuss the factual or evidentiary basis for its…
[South Carolina] Department of Juvenile Justice’s Broad River Road Complex: Notice and Investigation
On February 5, 2020, the DOJ sent notice to the Governor of South Carolina regarding the alleged conditions they have reasonable cause to believe violate the U.S. Constitution at the Broad River Road Complex juvenile facility. The notice states, in part, “After carefully reviewing the evidence, we conclude that there is reasonable cause to believe…
On October 22, 2019, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in a federal conditions lawsuit, filed on behalf of children with disabilities confined at the Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center in Vermont. The DOJ highlighted language included in the federal First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5043(b)(1) reiterating that juvenile isolation principles “explicitly prohibits the…
The Louisiana Supreme Court took up defense counsel’s writ following the trial court’s denial of a motion to quash following the State’s dismissal and refiling of charges following two adverse rulings, in effect evading all appellate review of the court’s ruling. The court found the accused, Mr. Reimonenq’s, 14th Amendment right to due process and…
On November 15, 2018, a joint settlement was reached to address the conditions of confinement in Florida’s Palm Beach County Jail. The settlement agreement outlines comprehensive changes in the facility, including giving young people time and access to appropriate recreational activities outside of their cells during school hours. The settlement also limits the amount of…
This article argues the Supreme Court’s recognition that children “are different than adults” creates a substantive due process right for every child to have an individualized assessment of their youthfulness at all critical junctures of a juvenile court proceeding, including transfer hearings. The article reviews transfer hearing statutes across the country and also analyzes fourteen…
On October 1, 2018, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in a federal class action lawsuit on behalf of young people confined in Florida’s Palm Beach County Jail. The DOJ highlights the protections afforded to students with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the “independent and shared” responsibilities and obligations…
On June 21, 2018, a federal class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of young people confined in the Palm Beach County Jail, alleging violations of their 8th and 14th Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs are youth whose cases have been direct-filed in adult court in Palm Beach County, Florida. The complaint…
The Kentucky Supreme Court found that competency attaches for young people at transfer hearings pursuant to the 6th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution as well as Section 11 of the Kentucky Constitution. The Court reasoned that because transfer hearings are critically important proceedings as identified in Kent, competence must be established before transfer…
“In this article, we address the question left unanswered by the Court in J.D.B.: In light of the substantial research establishing that children’s understanding and appreciation of the Miranda warnings are quite limited, must the traditional test for assessing the validity of an individual’s waiver of their Miranda rights be re-calibrated to take into account…
On October 17, 2017, the DOJ closed its investigation of the Pendleton Juvenile Correctional Facility, citing improvements made to the facility. The letter states, “Most broadly, the State has made system-wide efforts to minimize incarceration of youth; to move toward a rehabilitative juvenile justice model; to increase youth’s access to community-based alternatives to incarceration; and…
On January 3, 2017, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in a case involving the use of solitary confinement for 16 and 17 year olds in the Onondaga County Justice Center in New York. This brief outlines the harms of solitary confinement as applied to young people in light of their brain development and…
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in a federal class action lawsuit challenging the use of solitary confinement for 16- and 17-year-old youth in custody, including youth with disabilities. Calling for the federal district court to consider Supreme Court jurisprudence and growing scientific research on adolescent development, the DOJ asserts, “Juveniles…
This article from the American Criminal Law Review “argues that our judicial system and legislatures, when crafting juvenile justice law, policy, and practice, cannot stop with merely incorporating the research behind the impact of normal adolescent development on the decisionmaking abilities of youth; they must also incorporate the research behind how the experience of trauma…
A sample motion arguing child pornography laws are unconstitutional as applied to a children engaging in sexting. The motion argues the statute is void-for-vagueness since it fails to provide fair notice regarding prohibited conduct for children under 18 and it encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement because the distinction between offender and victim is blurred. Furthermore,…
On December 14, 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a settlement agreement with the St. Louis County Family Court to remedy constitutional violations. The settlement agreement covers policies and practices to ensure the due process and equal protection rights of all youth are upheld. This includes early appointment of youth defense counsel, prohibition…
On November 28, 2016, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in response to a lawsuit filed in South Carolina, challenging two state statutes as void for vagueness in violation of the Due Process Clause. The lawsuit alleged that the vague language in the statute resulted in the criminalization of common youthful behavior, racial disparities,…
“This pocket edition of the In re Gault opinion provides youth defenders, children’s advocates, and champions of justice with an invaluable tool: the constitutional mandate for the protection of children’s rights. The 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision forever changed the landscape of youth justice. No longer could judges or probation officers use good intentions as…
On January 12, 2016, the DOJ released its second investigation findings on the Leflore County Juvenile Detention Center in Greenwood, Mississippi. The DOJ found “reasonable cause to believe that the provision of special education and related services at the Detention Center violate the federal rights of children under IDEA.” Specifically, the DOJ stated, “Our investigation…
On December 9, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division terminated the consent decree, finding the Ohio Department of Youth Services in substantial compliance with the consent decree. Notable improvements made to the Ohio juvenile facilities include: “meaningful grievance system and easy access to attorneys to address concerns related…
From the abstract: “A monumental shift in juvenile justice is underway, inspired by the wide recognition that incarceration is not the solution to youth crime. In its place, “electronic monitoring” has gained widespread support as a new form of judicial control over youth offenders. Supporters herald it as “jail-to-go”: a cost-efficient alternative to incarceration that…
