Sentencing

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

ACLU of Michigan et al., Amicus, People v. Poole

Categories: ,

Disposable Children: The Prevalence of Child Abuse and Trauma Among Children Prosecuted and Incarcerated As Adults in Maryland

Categories: , ,

This report details the results of the first-ever state-wide Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) survey administered to people currently incarcerated for crimes they committed as children (under eighteen). The trauma measured from ACEs surveys include physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; physical and emotional neglect; separation from parents; mental illness or substance abuse in the home; parent…

Juvenile Law Center et al., Amicus Brief, People v. Czarnecki

Categories: , ,

Human Rights Watch, et al. Amicus Brief, O.G. v. Superior Court

Categories: , , ,

This amicus brief supporting the petitioner O.G. asks the California Appellate Court to uphold the passage of SB 1391, which eliminated transfer of 14- and 15- year old to adult court. The amicus brief outlines why the law ensures age-appropriate services for young people as well as protecting public safety by reducing recidvisim and strengthening…

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission – Court Decision

Categories: , ,

From the memorandum opinion: “Two men on lifetime parole claim they face disability discrimination from two federal agencies that supervise them. So these men, William Mathis and Kennedy Davis (together, “the Parolees”), now sue those federal agencies, the U.S. Parole Commission and the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, and the heads of those agencies…

Youth Justice By The Numbers

Categories: , , ,

The Sentencing Project released an updated snapshot of youth arrest and incarceration rates, revealing that youth arrest rates have declined 80% from 1996 and youth incarceration declined 75% between 2000 and 2022. Despite these shrinking rates, the juvenile legal system is still marked by significant racial and ethnic disparities. Black youth are 4.7 times more…

State v. Fletcher, 555 P.3d 1046 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024)

Categories: , ,

American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, the Gault Center et al. Amicus Brief, State v. Jones et al. 

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief from American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, the Gault Center, and others argues there is no reasonable, scientific basis for drawing the line for adolescence at age 18, and therefore protections from Comer (including reconsideration of lengthy sentences for homicide offenses committed by individuals under 18) should extend to young people who were 18 to 20 years old.  Additionally, the brief…

In the Matter of Registrant R.H. (N.J. Supreme Court)

Categories: , ,

Unheard: The Epidemic of Severe Childhood Trauma Among Girls Tried as Adults

Categories: ,

This research article explores the history of girls prosecuted as adults in courts across the United States. It explores the effects of childhood trauma and victimization on brain and physical development and the connection to involvement in the criminal legal system as children. The article describes the results of a survey of young women who…

Justice Is Not a Game: The Devastating Racial Inequity of Washington’s Three Strikes Law

Categories: , ,

From the introduction: “The report begins by examining the racial impact of the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) through data. The racially disparate application of the Three Strikes Law has been documented since shortly after the law’s passage and has held constant for more than two decades. This report presents the most recent data related…

Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior Amicus Brief, Arizona v. Jerald

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief from the Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior highlights the adolescent capacity for significant growth and social maturation as well as criminological evidence on the unlikelihood of reoffending and responsiveness to evidence-based treatment among youth accused of sex offenses. The brief ultimately calls for the court to find that a de facto life without parole sentence is grossly disproportionate based on developmental science and research.   From the Summary of Argument:  “Evan McCarrick Jerald is…

Juvenile Life Without Parole in Pennsylvania: Age, Cognitive Immaturity, and Culpability

Categories: , ,

Abstract:  “While there has been momentum at both the federal and state levels to curtail extreme punishments for justice-involved juveniles (The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, 2023), 22 states continue to permit the sentence of juvenile life without parole (JLWOP). Pennsylvania is among them. This essay focuses on judicial rationale in five JLWOP re-sentencing cases in…

State of Washington v. Kimonti D. Carter and Shawn Dee Reite

Categories: ,

The Second Look Movement: A Review of the Nation’s Sentence Review Laws

Categories: , ,

This report presents the evolution of the second look movement, which started with ensuring compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Graham v. Florida (2010) and Miller v. Alabama (2012) on the constitutionality of juvenile life without parole (“JLWOP”) sentences.12 This reform has more recently expanded to other types of sentences and populations, such…

Juvenile Life without Parole: Unusual and Unequal.

Categories: , ,

A concentration of a few states has unevenly complied with Miller and the possibility of resentencing provided by Montgomery. Some states have refused to comply at all. This uneven implementation of the Miller decision has a particularly profound impact on racial disparities among those serving JLWOP. An analysis of those deemed worth protecting from JLWOP…

Criteria and Procedures for Meaningful Parole Review for People Sentenced as Youth

Categories: ,

This paper is part of the Series on Learning from Civil Rights Lawsuits from the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse and focuses on parole review procedures for individuals serving long sentences for crimes committed under age 18, discusses constitutional dimensions of parole review for this group, and proposes model policies supporting a meaningful opportunities for release.   From the Executive Summary:  “In recent years, people serving…

Same Crime, Different Time: Sentencing Disparities in the Deep South & A Path Forward Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Categories: ,

From the introduction: “Although racial discrimination in the Deep South is not the outright focus of this Note—many other scholars have tackled this subject—it remains an underlying ugly truth that is woven into the conversation throughout. Rather than illuminate an already expansive area of jurisprudence, the Author has sought to address racial disparities in sentencing…

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission – Complaint

Categories: , ,

From the preliminary statement: “This case, brought by a class of people who are or will be on parole or supervised release in Washington, D.C., challenges the failure of the federal government’s post-conviction supervision system to accommodate individuals with disabilities as required by federal law.”

A Path Toward Race-Conscious Standards for Youth: Translating Adultification Bias Theory into Doctrinal Interventions in Criminal Court

Categories: ,

Abstract:   “This article demonstrates how advocates can leverage empirical literature regarding adultification bias to craft doctrinal interventions that recognize and remedy the disproportionately harsh treatment of Black youth in the juvenile and adult criminal legal system. Through case examples, all of which I litigated in the Civil Rights Clinic at Seattle University School of Law, I demonstrate how adultification…

A Brief Timeline of States Banning Juvenile Life Without Parole

Categories: , ,

A brief timeline of states banning juvenile life without parole.

Girlhood Interrupted: The Erasure of Black Girls’ Childhood

Categories: ,

What Goes Up But Never Comes Down? Juvenile Punitive Practice Within the United States

Categories: ,

From the Introduction of the Paper:  “The U.S.’s failure to implement an internationally abiding federal law regulating juvenile justice has important implications on the treatment of incarcerated adolescent populations while incarcerated, rehabilitated, and reintegrated into society. This article will analyze the harmful and outdated legal frameworks and institutional structures of the U.S. juvenile justice systems.…

Does “Jamal” Receive a Harsher Sentence Than “James”? First-Name Bias in the Criminal Sentencing of Black Men

Categories: ,

Advancing Racial Justice Through the Restatement of Children and the Law: The Challenge, the Intent, and the Opportunity

Categories: ,

From the Introduction:   “Racial inequities are addressed to varying degrees in at least three of the four sections of the Restatement of Children and the Law. This Essay evaluates whether and how well this Restatement advances racial justice and identifies additional opportunities for the ALI to address racial inequities now and in future iterations of the Restatement. The…