Representing Minors Charged with Murder: A Guide for Attorneys

Categories: , , ,

Young v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 297 (Md. 2025)

Categories: , ,

People v. Poole, 2025 Mich.LEXIS 565 (Mich. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Fines, Forfeitures, and Federalism

Categories: ,

   

Toolkit for Fighting Mass Incarceration in the 119th Congress

Categories: ,

The Eugenics Origins of Three Strikes Laws: How “Habitual Offender” Laws Were Used as a Means of Sterilization

Categories: ,

Coming Out of Concrete Closets

Categories: , , ,

People v. Eads (Michigan Court of Appeals)

Categories: , ,

From the conclusion: “For the reasons discussed, Miller and its progeny have rendered Eads’s term-of-years sentence invalid under both the Michigan Constitution and our state’s proportionality requirement. He is entitled to be resentenced in a manner that comports with this jurisprudence and duly accounts for his youth and its attendant characteristics at the time he…

Fair and Just Prosecution Amicus Brief in Michigan v. Montario Taylor

Categories: , ,

In this amicus brief (and a companion brief filed in Michigan v. Andrew Czarnecki), Fair and Just Prosecution urges the Michigan Supreme Court to extend 19- and 20-year olds its finding that life without parole sentences for young people violate state and federal constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment.

Developmental Science Scholars and Nonprofits Amicus Brief, People v. Taylor

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by forty developmental science scholars and nonprofits argues transformative growth during ages 18-20 makes mandatory LWOP for individuals in that age range a disproportionate sentence in violation of Article 1, Section 16 of the Michigan constitution.   From the Summary of the Argument:  “People v Parks held that Article 1, Section 16…

The ACLU of Michigan, et al., Amicus People v. Taylor

Categories: ,

ACLU of Michigan et al., Amicus, People v. Poole

Categories: ,

Disposable Children: The Prevalence of Child Abuse and Trauma Among Children Prosecuted and Incarcerated As Adults in Maryland

Categories: , ,

This report details the results of the first-ever state-wide Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) survey administered to people currently incarcerated for crimes they committed as children (under eighteen). The trauma measured from ACEs surveys include physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; physical and emotional neglect; separation from parents; mental illness or substance abuse in the home; parent…

Juvenile Law Center et al., Amicus Brief, People v. Czarnecki

Categories: , ,

Human Rights Watch, et al. Amicus Brief, O.G. v. Superior Court

Categories: , , ,

This amicus brief supporting the petitioner O.G. asks the California Appellate Court to uphold the passage of SB 1391, which eliminated transfer of 14- and 15- year old to adult court. The amicus brief outlines why the law ensures age-appropriate services for young people as well as protecting public safety by reducing recidvisim and strengthening…

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission – Court Decision

Categories: , ,

From the memorandum opinion: “Two men on lifetime parole claim they face disability discrimination from two federal agencies that supervise them. So these men, William Mathis and Kennedy Davis (together, “the Parolees”), now sue those federal agencies, the U.S. Parole Commission and the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, and the heads of those agencies…

Youth Justice By The Numbers

Categories: , , ,

The Sentencing Project released an updated snapshot of youth arrest and incarceration rates, revealing that youth arrest rates have declined 80% from 1996 and youth incarceration declined 75% between 2000 and 2022. Despite these shrinking rates, the juvenile legal system is still marked by significant racial and ethnic disparities. Black youth are 4.7 times more…

State v. Fletcher, 555 P.3d 1046 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024)

Categories: , ,

American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, the Gault Center et al. Amicus Brief, State v. Jones et al. 

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief from American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, the Gault Center, and others argues there is no reasonable, scientific basis for drawing the line for adolescence at age 18, and therefore protections from Comer (including reconsideration of lengthy sentences for homicide offenses committed by individuals under 18) should extend to young people who were 18 to 20 years old.  Additionally, the brief…

In the Matter of Registrant R.H. (N.J. Supreme Court)

Categories: , ,

Unheard: The Epidemic of Severe Childhood Trauma Among Girls Tried as Adults

Categories: ,

This research article explores the history of girls prosecuted as adults in courts across the United States. It explores the effects of childhood trauma and victimization on brain and physical development and the connection to involvement in the criminal legal system as children. The article describes the results of a survey of young women who…

Justice Is Not a Game: The Devastating Racial Inequity of Washington’s Three Strikes Law

Categories: , ,

From the introduction: “The report begins by examining the racial impact of the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) through data. The racially disparate application of the Three Strikes Law has been documented since shortly after the law’s passage and has held constant for more than two decades. This report presents the most recent data related…

Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior Amicus Brief, Arizona v. Jerald

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief from the Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior highlights the adolescent capacity for significant growth and social maturation as well as criminological evidence on the unlikelihood of reoffending and responsiveness to evidence-based treatment among youth accused of sex offenses. The brief ultimately calls for the court to find that a de facto life without parole sentence is grossly disproportionate based on developmental science and research.   From the Summary of Argument:  “Evan McCarrick Jerald is…

Juvenile Life Without Parole in Pennsylvania: Age, Cognitive Immaturity, and Culpability

Categories: , ,

Abstract:  “While there has been momentum at both the federal and state levels to curtail extreme punishments for justice-involved juveniles (The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, 2023), 22 states continue to permit the sentence of juvenile life without parole (JLWOP). Pennsylvania is among them. This essay focuses on judicial rationale in five JLWOP re-sentencing cases in…

State of Washington v. Kimonti D. Carter and Shawn Dee Reite

Categories: ,