Sentencing

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

Latino Youth Incarceration (2025 Update)

Categories: ,

Tribal Youth Incarceration (2025 Update)

Categories: ,

People v. Boyd-Malone, 2025 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4860 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Key Statutes & Cases Related to Youth with Disabilities in the Juvenile Legal System

Categories: ,

Plea Bargains as Drivers of Incarceration-Related Health Outcomes

Categories: ,

From the abstract: “The discipline of public health has begun to recognize the structural inequities of the carceral system as drivers of poor individual and population health. Thenumberofpeopleincarceratedandthelengthoftheirincarcerationdeterminethescopeandgravityoftheirexposureto these individual and public health effects. Plea bargains all but guarantee a period of incarceration, often for many years, because prosecutors have significant bargaining power against defendants…

People v. Hannah, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Memorandum from the American Civil Liberties Union: Problems with Electronic Monitoring for Young People with Disabilities 

Categories: ,

This memorandum from the American Civil Liberties Union provides litigation strategies for defenders challenging electronic monitoring conditions for young people with disabilities.  From the Introduction to the memorandum: “Overall, this research project/memo aims to reduce the use of EM for kids with disabilities. Although there is no straightforward disability or accommodations-related argument for ending EM…

State v. Fillo, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 981 (Wash. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

U.S. v. Palacios, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96248 (E.D.N.Y. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Understanding the Needs of the Intellectually and Developmentally Disabled and Autistic Population in the Criminal Justice System

Categories: ,

From the abstract: “This paper explores the inequitable treatment of the Intellectually and Developmentally Disabled and Autistic (IDD/A) population in the criminal justice system. Although progress has been made over the past century with understanding the unique needs of this population, they still face challenges at all stages of the criminal justice system. Behavioral, social…

People v. Luu, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 269 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

United States v. Viera- Rivera, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79378 (D.P.R. 2025)

Categories: , ,

State v. D.S.H., 339 Ore. App. 596 (Or. Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

On April 9, 2025, the Oregon Court of Appeals found that a probation condition ordering a youth “to follow probation conditions as designated by OYA [the Oregon Youth Authority]” was legally insufficient to determine whether a young person violated a term of their probation. The Court explained, “without knowing what probation conditions OYA had actually…

Representing Minors Charged with Murder: A Guide for Attorneys

Categories: , , ,

Young v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 297 (Md. 2025)

Categories: , ,

People v. Poole, 2025 Mich.LEXIS 565 (Mich. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Opinion: Trump is stoking fears about D.C.’s crime but the city is safer than it’s been in decades.

Categories: , ,

Georgetown University Law Center Associate Professor Eduardo Ferrer penned this op-Ed on  regarding the narrative that there is a “rise” in violent crime in D.C. This narrative is being used to justify regressive tough-on-crime policies that do not improve public safety. Professor Ferrer discusses the perception versus the reality of crime statistics and data, including…

Fines, Forfeitures, and Federalism

Categories: ,

   

Toolkit for Fighting Mass Incarceration in the 119th Congress

Categories: ,

The Eugenics Origins of Three Strikes Laws: How “Habitual Offender” Laws Were Used as a Means of Sterilization

Categories: ,

Coming Out of Concrete Closets

Categories: , , ,

People v. Eads (Michigan Court of Appeals)

Categories: , ,

From the conclusion: “For the reasons discussed, Miller and its progeny have rendered Eads’s term-of-years sentence invalid under both the Michigan Constitution and our state’s proportionality requirement. He is entitled to be resentenced in a manner that comports with this jurisprudence and duly accounts for his youth and its attendant characteristics at the time he…

Fair and Just Prosecution Amicus Brief in Michigan v. Montario Taylor

Categories: , ,

In this amicus brief (and a companion brief filed in Michigan v. Andrew Czarnecki), Fair and Just Prosecution urges the Michigan Supreme Court to extend 19- and 20-year olds its finding that life without parole sentences for young people violate state and federal constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment.

Developmental Science Scholars and Nonprofits Amicus Brief, People v. Taylor

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by forty developmental science scholars and nonprofits argues transformative growth during ages 18-20 makes mandatory LWOP for individuals in that age range a disproportionate sentence in violation of Article 1, Section 16 of the Michigan constitution.   From the Summary of the Argument:  “People v Parks held that Article 1, Section 16…

The ACLU of Michigan, et al., Amicus People v. Taylor

Categories: ,