Waiver of Rights

You must be logged into your Gault Center account to view this page.

What is Bindover or Transfer? In Re D.T., Case No. 2024-1276 (Ohio)

Categories: , , , ,

This resource offers a brief overview of how children are transferred or bound over to adult court in Ohio and discusses what is at stake in the case of State v. D.T., 2024-Ohio-4482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024) pending before the Ohio Supreme Court. The Gault Center filed an amicus in this case here. Oral arguments were…

State v. McLain, 2025 ME 87 (Me. 2025)

Categories: , ,

The Supreme Court of Maine vacated a conviction, finding that custodial statements should have been suppressed because there was no waiver of the privilege against self-incrimination, and offered the following language in support. “McLain did not clearly waive his privilege against self-incrimination and instead answered that it “depend[ed] on the questions” when asked if he…

 State v. Howard, 2025 Ohio 1462 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)

Categories: , ,

Police-Induced Confessions, 2.0: Risk Factors and Recommendations

Categories: ,

Demystifying the Plea Process: Investigating Attorney Communications and Client Misconceptions

Categories: ,

NJDC & Players Coalition team up to protect young people

Categories: ,

NJDC is proud to partner with the Players Coalition to eliminate barriers to that prevent young people from accessing their constitutional right to counsel.

Fees & Costs Judicial Training Webinar

Categories: ,

Devin McCourty – Support Youth Access to Counsel – NJDC

Categories: ,

New England Patriot Devin McCourty and Players Coalition team up with the National Juvenile Defender Center to raise awareness that far too many young people in juvenile court don’t ever get lawyers.

Anquan Boldin – The Cost of Justice for Youth

Categories: ,

“What we know is that when access to justice depends on a child’s ability to pay for their own defense, the disparities of class, race, and ethnicity are magnified.”

National Youth Defense System Standards

Categories: , , , , , , ,

Outlines steps that states must take to comply with the minimum requirements of the U.S. Constitution to protect the rights of youth facing deprivations of liberty.

J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011)

Categories: , , , , , , ,

The Importance of Early Appointment of Counsel in Juvenile Court

Categories: ,

NJDC Letter to Indiana Supreme Court in support of the Juvenile Appointment of Counsel Rule Amendment

Categories: , ,

Waving Good-Bye to Waiver: A Developmental Argument Against Youths’ Waiver of Miranda Rights

Categories: , ,

Competence to Waive Interrogation Rights and Adjudicative Competence in Adolescent Defendants: Cognitive Development, Attorney Contact, and Psychological Symptoms

Categories: , ,

Young Offenders and Legal Competencies

Categories: , ,

Michigan v. E.E., 346 Mich. App. 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2023)

Categories: , ,

Guilty Plea Hearings in Juvenile and Criminal Court

Categories: , , ,

People v. Thorne, 207 A.D.3d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Categories: , ,

The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division reversed the guilty plea and conviction of Mr. Thorne after the court denied his motion to suppress, finding that the arresting officers lacked requisite reasonable suspicion to stop him. The Court, citing several inconsistencies in the radio description of the assailant compared to Mr. Thorne, offered the following language in support:   “The officers did not have reasonable…

“You Have the Right to Keep Quiet”: Translation Inadequacies in Nevada’s Spanish Miranda Warning 

Categories: , ,

The landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the United States Supreme Court required law enforcement agencies to advise all suspects of their “Miranda warnings,” or Constitutional protections, prior to interrogation. Previous research demonstrates that the Miranda warnings in the United States are largely unregulated and highlights how inadequate translations can impact comprehensibility. The present study…

State v. D.T., 2024-Ohio-4482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)

Categories: , ,

The Ohio Appellate Court vacated a youth’s convictions and transfer order and offered the following language in support. “Because the juvenile court (1) did not identify all of the factors it considered, i.e., the “other information factors” referenced at the amenability hearing, (2) did not identify or discuss the factual or evidentiary basis for its…

Fees and Costs of Arizona’s Juvenile Justice System

Categories: ,

“Not once does the judge or probation officer explain how expensive it’s going to be if you plead guilty without an attorney… The probation officer that said, ‘it’s really expensive to have a lawyer,’ neglected to say ‘it’s really expensive to have a probation officer.’” – NJDC’s Legal Director, Tim Curry on children waiving the…

Ensuring Access: A Policy Advocacy Toolkit (2018)

Categories: , ,

Access Denied found that “[n]o jurisdiction in the United States wholly fulfills the constitutional promise of justice for children.” So, no matter where you live and practice, your jurisdiction can improve. As juvenile defense advocates, we have a responsibility to identify and work to correct systemic deficiencies and to honor our clients’ dignity and well-being.…

A First Look at the Plea Deal Experience of Juveniles Tried in Adult Court

Categories: ,

ABA Waiver Resolution and Report

Categories: ,