Bringing More Teens Home: Raising the Age Without Expanding Secure Confinement in the Youth Justice System

Categories: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This report from The Sentencing Project highlights “raise the age” legislative successes across the country, underscoring that the use of youth confinement is not a necessary result of these legislative shifts. For the nine states that implemented raise the age legislation, only New York, North Carolina, and Louisiana added juvenile facilities that are still operating,…

“We Carry Guns to Stay Safe”: Perspectives on Guns and Gun Violence from Young Adults Living in Chicago’s West and South Sides

Categories: , , , ,

This report from the Urban Institute features results from a survey of young people in four Chicago neighborhoods to “learn from young adults firsthand whether and why they decide to carry guns, how they acquire firearms, how they experience gun violence, and what they view as the best strategies to reduce gun carrying and promote safety in their communities.”  From the report: …

Raising the Age: Shifting to a Safer and More Effective Juvenile Justice System

Categories: , , , , , , , ,

This report from Justice Policy Institute highlights lessons learned from states that have raised the age of juvenile court jurisdiction, including Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. The report examines state fiscal data, juvenile legal system data, crime trends, confinement data, recidivism research, and case studies to draw conclusions about the…

Improving Approaches to Serving Young Adults in the Justice System

Categories: , , , , , , , , ,

Juvenile Law Center, Loyola Civitas Childlaw Clinic et al. Amicus Brief, Illinois v. Pacheco

Categories: , ,

This amici brief by Juvenile Law Center, Loyola Civitas Childlaw Clinic, and others argues automatic prosecution and mandatory sentencing of young people charged with felony murder is unconstitutional in light of recent Supreme Court case law as Illinois law does not allow for individual sentencing based on maturity and culpability. Furthemore, the brief argues the…

Loyola Civitas Childlaw Center, Children and Family Justice Center et al. Amicus Brief, Illinois v. Austin M. 

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by Loyola Civitas ChildLaw Center, Juvenile Law Center, The Gault Center, and others argues there is a per se conflict of interest when a child’s defense attorney also acts as their guardian ad litem. The brief argues the guardian ad litem’s ethical and legal obligation to act in the child’s “best interest”…

The Children and Family Justice Center and The Gault Center Amicus Brief, Illinois v. Salas

Categories: , ,

This amicus brief by Juvenile Law Center and The Gault Center argues Illinois automatic transfer law does not comply with recent research and findings on adolescent development as recognized by the Supreme Court jurisprudence in Roper and Graham. Further, amici argue the state’s automatic transfer statute violates the proportionality clause of Article I, Section 11…

Models for Change- Building Momentum for Juvenile Justice Reform

Categories: , , , , ,

From the introduction: “This brief tells the story of how the four Models for Change states—Pennsylvania, Illinois, Louisiana, and Washington—are already moving to reform and reshape their own state juvenile justice systems. These states have demonstrated strong leadership in juvenile justice policy, value collaboration and engagement, and because of their efforts, have changed the political…

Cost-Effective Youth Corrections: Rationalizing the Fiscal Architecture of Juvenile Justice

Categories: , , , , , ,

Reducing Racial Disparities in Juvenile Detention

Categories: , , , , , ,

From the introduction: “In this Pathway we explore why youth of color are overrepresented in the juvenile detention system and review what has been done in some sites to reduce the number of minority youth in detention. Dealing with disparity in the use of detention has been one of the most challenging pieces of the…