Youth in Adult Court
The Court of Appeals of Washington remanded a case for resentencing finding that the trial court abused its discretion by “failing to place greater emphasis on Thang’s mitigating qualities of youth during resentencing,” pursuant to the Miller decision. The court stated in relevant part: “We agree with Thang that this analysis shows that the sentencing…
This one-pager from the Juvenile Law Center can be used as an educational tool for judges, policy makers, community members and other decision makers when talking about transfer to adult court. From the one-pager: “Policies that try children in the adult court system fail to consider the harms of youth transfer, the unique developmental characteristics…
The 1st District Court of Appeals vacated a sentence involving, finding that the trial court failed to properly consider youthfulness at the time of offense as a mitigating factor. The court stated in relevant part: “Defendant argues that the trial court again failed to properly consider his youth at the time of the offense as…
The Oregon Court of Appeals examined a state sentencing statute that prohibits juvenile life without parole sentences (ORS 161.740) and held that it applies when an individual is convicted in adult court and sentenced for an offense committed when they were under the age of 18 if the sentence was imposed on or after January…
This report, written by the Sentencing Project, highlights the harmful practice of direct file, or “auto-charging” youth in adult court. This national analysis looks at the practice of direct file and the pervasive harms that it has on the wellbeing and future thriving of young people and makes recommendations for states to limit pathways for…
The Supreme Court of Washington vacated a conviction for second-degree murder, finding that the 16-year-old defendant’s waiver of rights was invalid, considering her age, recent head trauma, and lack of experience with the police. The court stated in relevant part: “Luna challenges several evidentiary rulings and argues that the court should have applied newly enacted…
This amicus brief from over 26 juvenile justice amici, including the Gault Center, , argues 1) the spirit and text of New York’s passage of landmark Raise the Age Law rejects the attitudes that underlay the Juvenile Offender Act of 1978, 2) New York’s Raise the Age Law and its legislative history demands a youth subject to adult prosecution only in “extremely rare and exceptional cases”, 3) before courts…
This report highlights D.C. transfer laws and discusses the current U.S. Attorney’s argument that the District of Columbia should amend its law to transfer more young people to to adult court. The report compares D.C.’s transfer law to transfer laws across the country and highlights decades of research that has concluded transfer laws do not…
The Third District Court of Appeals in Florida considered a writ of Habeas Corpus filed by petitioners India Comer and Shantearia Gaines, challenging their detention in an adult correctional center. The Court of Appeals granted the petition and issued the writ, ordering Ms. Comer and Ms. Gaines to be moved to the juvenile detention center.…
Former Secretary of the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, Vinny Schiraldi, wrote this op-ed, discussing President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in Washington D.C. and the District’s intentions to repeal lower the age for trying children as adults to 12 in the Youth Rehabilitation Act. The op-ed details Vinny’s reflections and observations during his…
This resource offers a brief overview of how children are transferred or bound over to adult court in Ohio and discusses what is at stake in the case of State v. D.T., 2024-Ohio-4482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024) pending before the Ohio Supreme Court. The Gault Center filed an amicus in this case here. Oral arguments were…
This issue brief by the Juvenile Justice Initiative provides an overview of transfer laws in Illinois. Additionally, the brief reviews demographic data on young people who are being tried as adults and identifies the ways that transfer fails children and public safety in the state of Illinois. The brief ends by calling for a return…
This article featured on the Frameworks Institute website offers research-based communication strategies for combating the manufactured controversy of a “crime emergency” caused by adolescents in Washington D.C. The article provides a topline nonpartisan message for responding to the relentless, toxic messaging around adolescent crime and outlines five framing recommendations for discussing the harmful policies being…
This resource is part of the Youth Defender Advocacy Program (YDAP) curriculum, a specialized trial advocacy training program for youth defenders.
The Supreme Court of Montana reversed a trial court’s decision denying a sentence reduction for a young adult who was convicted of a homicide offense when he was 16 years old. Noting that transferring a youth to adult court cannot mean that the state “forget[s] about his age,” the Court relies on the juvenile court…
Following the 20th anniversary of the Roper v. Simmons decision that ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for youth under the age of 18, the Death Penalty Information Center released a report on the latest science of adolescent brain development and evolving societal standards that recognize the need for heightened legal protections for 18- to 20-year-olds.…
